“No particular risk has been identified.
No restrictions and open schools, ”tweeted the Seine-Maritime prefecture on Tuesday after the fire at three industrial warehouses in Rouen, one of which housed 12,000 lithium batteries.
Paul Poulain, consultant engineer "industrial risks" at the firm RiskCare, and author of
Everything can explode
(ed. Fayard) is surprised by a communication that he considers "very light", even "casual".
"Any fire is toxic, even more so when lithium batteries are burning", he recalls, pointing out the slight progress, in France, in the management of industrial risks since the Lubrizol fire... already in Rouen.
Thick black smoke and a series of explosions in the middle of the night… The images of the industrial warehouse fires in Grand-Couronne, near Rouen, are impressive.
He first touched, from 4:30 p.m. on Monday, two warehouses rented by Bolloré Logisticts.
One housed 12,000 lithium batteries, the other 70,000 tires.
The fire will be contained at 11.30 p.m. by the hundred firefighters on site, before a new start, from 3 a.m., puts everyone back on deck, this time in a third warehouse nearby, belonging to the company. Ziegler and containing textile and sequins.
This new industrial accident has inevitably awakened a very bad memory among the people of Rouen.
That of the Lubrizol fire on September 26, 2019, a few kilometers away and which had marked the spirits, both by its duration (12 hours) and by the quantity of chemicals which had burned (9,500 tons).
This Tuesday morning, Pierre-André Durand, prefect of Seine-Maritime, wanted to be reassuring.
“The results of the analyzes carried out throughout the night […] make it possible to confirm the absence of a significant concentration of substances in the air linked to the fire”, he assures in a press release.
The prefecture thus justifies the decision to introduce no traffic restrictions this Tuesday in the agglomeration, nor that of closing the schools.
A “very light” communication, deplores Paul Poulain, consulting engineer “industrial risks” at the firm Riskcare, and author of
Everything can explode
(ed. Fayard).
He is answering our questions.
“No particular risk has been identified”… Should we be as confident as the prefecture of Seine-Maritime?
We can understand that the prefect wishes to reassure the population.
But from there to adopting such a light, almost casual posture, it raises questions.
Any fire is toxic and releases approximately 200 chemicals.
But in what has burned in the last few hours, there are lithium batteries whose toxicity is well known in the industry.
One of the warehouses still stored 12,000.
In its press releases, the prefecture recognizes that the combustion of lithium represents a chemical risk.
But it restricts it to the release of hydrofluoric acid and ensures that this substance has not been detected outside the site.
It's very light.
The National Research and Safety Institute (IRSN) lists other pollutants* that can be released in lithium battery fires.
Moreover,
we never take into account the “cocktail effect”.
The second affected warehouse housed 70,000 tires and the third pallets and fabric.
What are the consequences of mixing these fumes?
It was not even said whether or not the roofs of these buildings contained asbestos.
Should we then consider this new fire as just as serious as that of Lubrizol?
This should be discussed with toxicologists.
Personally, I think it can be just as serious.
It is specified that the site burned this time was not classified Seveso**, like that of Lubrizol.
With this idea behind it, it would be less serious.
But it is not the category of a site that determines the danger of a fire.
You have to look in detail at the nature of the substances that burned, but also take into account the time at which it happened.
The Lubrizol fire mainly took place at night.
Monday, the fire started at 4:30 p.m., just when people are in the street, picking up their children from school, starting to get out of work.
We can assume that many more Rouennais were exposed to the cloud of smoke.
Moreover, the fire is not yet completely extinguished.
This is the subtlety of the words used by the prefecture.
She says the fire is "contained".
This means that it is no longer supposed to leave a perimeter where we have managed to limit it.
But it is not yet extinct and can always start again.
At midnight last night, the prefecture was already saying that the fire was contained, before a third warehouse blazed at 3 a.m.
Be that as it may, we must not stop there on this new industrial accident.
Admittedly, the prefecture specifies that the additional measurements and analyzes will continue.
It is to be hoped that the authorities will go so far as to carry out an epidemiological study monitoring, over the long term, the health of local residents.
This means that it is no longer supposed to leave a perimeter where we have managed to limit it.
But it is not yet extinct and can always start again.
At midnight last night, the prefecture was already saying that the fire was contained, before a third warehouse blazed at 3 a.m.
Be that as it may, we must not stop there on this new industrial accident.
Admittedly, the prefecture specifies that the additional measurements and analyzes will continue.
It is to be hoped that the authorities will go so far as to carry out an epidemiological study monitoring, over the long term, the health of local residents.
This means that it is no longer supposed to leave a perimeter where we have managed to limit it.
But it is not yet extinct and can always start again.
At midnight last night, the prefecture was already saying that the fire was contained, before a third warehouse blazed at 3 a.m.
Be that as it may, we must not stop there on this new industrial accident.
Admittedly, the prefecture specifies that the additional measurements and analyzes will continue.
It is to be hoped that the authorities will go so far as to carry out an epidemiological study monitoring, over the long term, the health of local residents.
it will not be necessary to stop there on this new industrial accident.
Admittedly, the prefecture specifies that the additional measurements and analyzes will continue.
It is to be hoped that the authorities will go so far as to carry out an epidemiological study monitoring, over the long term, the health of local residents.
it will not be necessary to stop there on this new industrial accident.
Admittedly, the prefecture specifies that the additional measurements and analyzes will continue.
It is to be hoped that the authorities will go so far as to carry out an epidemiological study monitoring, over the long term, the health of local residents.
In September 2020, the government made a series of announcements to strengthen industrial risk management, precisely to learn the lessons of Lubrizol. Have we progressed since?
Not really.
One of the objectives announced at the time was to increase by 50% the annual inspections of the 500,000 Installations classified for the protection of the environment (ICPE)*** in France.
To do this, the government had announced 50 additional inspectors by the end of the five-year term.
A survey by
Liberation
, for the three years of Lubrizol, showed that the overall number of these agents has only declined since this disaster, in contradiction with the announced project.
However, the number of inspections has increased slightly, but they are then less thorough.
The Lubrizol fire had, for example, shown the weakness of public alert systems during an industrial accident and had led to the setting up of the FR-Alert system [SMS alert system coupled with a shrill ringing that informs you of what to do].
This new fire showed that we were still not up to speed on this culture of risk.
Monday evening, the prefecture considered that there was no need to trigger FR-Alert.
At the same time, on Facebook, surrounding municipalities [like Orival] invited their inhabitants to remain confined, to close the windows and not to go out under any circumstances.
A beautiful cacophony.
Above all, the decision of the prefecture not to introduce any restriction of activities and to leave the schools open questions.
The regulatory framework and prudence called for such measures.
Planet
Lubrizol fire: “Everyone has something to say about this September 26”… A year later, fear has not left the people of Rouen
Planet
Seveso sites: Will the Lubrizol fire serve as an electric shock in the management of industrial risk in France?
*Unusual or abusive conditions of use (overload, short-circuit, presence of an external heat source, etc.) may cause a thermal runaway phenomenon capable of generating leaks of this liquid electrolyte and a release of compounds dangerous to health, specifies the IRSN in a sheet devoted to lithium-ion batteries.
Like carbon monoxide, carbon dioxide, hydrogen fluoride, hydrogen chloride, formaldehyde, phosphoryl fluoride, benzene, styrene…”
** These sites present major accident risks and require maintaining a high level of prevention.
1,312 sites are classified in this way in France, including 705 at the high threshold.
*** Factories, farms, warehouses classified as such because they present risks of fire, explosion or pollution.
Fire
Rouen
Seine Maritime
Normandy
Lubrizol
Industry
Pollution
Air pollution
Planet