We are all in a state of uncertainty and acceptance of a complex reality for which we either were not ready, or we cannot be prepared.
Vladimir Putin's urgent appeal regarding partial mobilization answered some of the questions of society, outlined further actions, and showed the prospects for the development of the NWO.
And how to behave further is the responsibility of each individual.
The last and stupidest thing you can do is to lose your head and start to hysteria, inciting to take to the streets, aggravate the already nervous state in society.
Although the oppositionists who fled the country, who, sitting in warm places, are driving the Russians to rallies, they are counting on this - rocking the boat.
They're good when it's bad.
True, it is mostly juvenile heated heads that go out into the streets.
They come out, they are carefully picked up in paddy wagons and taken to the department until they are sent to their parents.
Here we walked.
Instead of consolidating, people opt for the tactic of idly wandering around the city and letting off steam through idleness.
In a circle, in a circle, in a circle.
I am extremely annoyed by the artificial creation of an atmosphere of hatred and incitement within society.
Cause shame in those who remain on the side of their country, supporting the actions of Russia in the liberated territories, albeit by the method of blood, but forced blood.
I am tired of experiencing fear and guilt for my opinion - an opinion based on the principles of humanity and humanism, an opinion built on respect for national foundations.
The same opinion, the presence of which any liberal should respect and cherish, but in fact denies.
Recently I came across a post by a female entrepreneur who told me how sad she is when she doesn’t see the answer option “but I don’t want to leave” in polls on the topic of the desired departure from the country.
That is, in a so-called progressive society, it is usually assumed that you either want to leave, but cannot, or have already left.
The girl says that her people are here, her land is here and she has the opportunity to do something for them.
For example, open a coffee shop around the corner or a store with fresh pastries.
And it will be more than doing nothing.
There are processes that we are powerless to influence, but we also have the opportunity to unite and do something.
You can complain about filth and poverty, expecting someone else to solve these problems, while you throw your cigarette butt on the ground or do not pay taxes, alimony, and quietly steal.
I have exactly the same attitude as that girl - I don’t want to leave here, this is my home, and, as in any home, I myself want to do better here without shifting responsibility to someone else.
If you want to leave, leave.
Choose a country that you think is a moral tuning fork and an ideal place to live, and be kind.
Who is holding you.
I am sure that after some time, having lived denial and, in fact, an escape, you will face the reality and the realization that nowhere is a perfect place.
And only those who have already lived in other countries, and not as a tourist, but as a local, faced with everyday problems, understand how different it is everywhere in their own way.
We are accustomed to considering other countries as a kind of benchmark for creating an ideal world, an example of how and where we need to move in the development of the country.
If they bomb or unleash coups d'etat and civil wars, then that's not it, that's not bad.
"It's different there," "it's different."
I love this therapeutic exercise where you fantasize for a moment and assume that nothing is what it seems.
Let's imagine that here, in our country, everything is fine, and it is we, Russia, who are right, and the decisions of our government are correct, but the rest of the world is not.
What then?
Then it will turn out that we have chosen the West as a measure of paradise almost without any reason, almost unconsciously proclaiming ourselves hell on earth.
As if in the end there was an opportunity to stagger on the streets.
In a circle, in a circle, in a circle.
The point of view of the author may not coincide with the position of the editors.