July Senate election 1 vote “Constitution” Judgment Nagoya High Court Nov. 7 16:32
In fact, the Nagoya High Court ruled that the so-called single vote disparity was tripled in the Upper House election in July, saying that it would not violate the constitution.
In the House of Councilors elections in July, there was a maximum difference of 3.002 times in the number of voters per member of the constituency, and lawyers and other groups said that “it was against the equality of voting value and violated the constitution”. An appeal was filed all over the country for invalidation.
Among these, in the ruling for Aichi, Gifu, and Mie constituencies, the Nagoya High Court ruled that it would not violate the constitution.
With this, 11 judgments have been issued nationwide by the 7th.
▽ Nine judgments for "constitution" that do not violate the constitution,
▽ There are two cases of “unconstitutional” judgments.
The disparity of one vote in the House of Councilors election was 3.08 times at the maximum in the previous three-year election, but in this election, correction was made to increase the number of elected seats in Saitama constituency, and the difference was 3.002 times at most. It was.