Comrade Donald, you are a great scientist and you know a lot about social networks.
Well, what is there to smile about?
By the way, Donald Trump is the first president in the world who chose social media as his main tool for communicating with the audience and the basis of his public (literally in real time) politics.
He used all the positive possibilities of social networks, and he was overtaken by the most negative aspects of all the same social networks.
Namely, he learned on his own skin, that is, on his blue jacket, what the social media ochlocracy is, what the party Internet press and party Internet literature are, and that the democrats in the zoo do not have a chimera called conscience.
And also, in fact, he is the highest-ranking man in the world - a victim of cancel culture.
What Twitter did to him, which literally parasitized on his presidency, cannot be compared to anything else.
Weinstein's case with Kevin Spacey is just a childish squeak on the lawn in terms of the degree of shock to all the foundations of the political universe, which until then proudly called itself democracy.
And he also learned that the Internet, run by "liberal-minded people," is not only mean, but also vindictive.
Already deprived of power, he watched how they dealt with his electorate, and not only on free sites like Facebook, but also saw the sites themselves if they suddenly seemed wrong and harmful to the winners.
And anything in America today is called harmful that does not praise the practice of the Democratic Party and its current slogans.
The fate of the Parler network is that science.
Science to him.
The fact that Donald Trump announced the creation of his own, independent social network literally two or three months later suggests that this decision already has some time limit, because two months is very fast for the launch of any car of this kind.
On the other hand, the team of IT-trumpists will face the same problems as any other platform, a priori hated by local bulkheads such as Apple or Google Pay.
This whole Silicon Valley, filled with exaggerated millionaires with the brains of globalists - it will also become a wall.
How is DT going to distribute its product to the smartphones of its fans?
Does he have enough money to run his OS?
Etc.
There, after all, he said "a" - you have to say "b".
Does the former president understand the scope of the task that he has voiced?
Is it overwhelming?
Internet corporations were so passionate about removing Trump from the White House that they inadvertently ignited the industry's worst secret - there is no such "free Internet" in the world.
And those fools who laughed at the attempts of the Chinese and the plans of the Russians to create a sovereign Internet (like, why?), And remained fools, even if with their own broadcasts on state Russian radio stations.
Trump talks about hitting global censorship, but will his response to the world's Zuckerberg be global enough?
He says the new network will be a game changer.
In response, we can only say to him that the only technique that will change the game in the Valley is a couple of "Calibers" in the main offices of this web.
Not that not according to Senka a hat - DT often exaggerates the significance of his undertakings, behind him it was always known.
And it may well be that he knows some other truth, why he needs his own social network.
For example, to restore communication with the electorate in case he decides to go into big politics in four years, when Kamala and Joe have already trampled the entire clearing of sanity in America.
Then we can talk about this social network as an instrument of the struggle for power within the Republican Party itself, some of whose functionaries simply hate Trump worse than Obama.
And if now his work with the electorate is not very visible, after some time he will present millions and millions of subscribers to the new network.
If some blogger in shorts and without has millions of subscribers, then you can be sure: the name and banner of Trump will collect more Dudya.
And maybe even more than the Festering One (whoever he is).
And then a completely different conversation will begin.
The point of view of the author may not coincide with the position of the editorial board.