A long time ago, in some past life, one of the pro-Kremlin youth (now no one even remembers what it is) presented Navalny for his lawyer status.
He allegedly received it in Kirov at a time when Nikita Belykh was the governor there, and Navalny had not yet betrayed him.
And he (Navalny) had to do it because he had no chance in Moscow - Henry Reznik (it seems it was him, but let it be conditional) wanted to ask Navalny in full.
And Navalny was not ready for this.
Among other things, in the presentation of the pro-Kremlin youth group, it was said in passing that Navalny had never worked as a lawyer, and two years of legal experience were required to obtain the status of a lawyer.
In response to this hit, Navalny wrote something like: “What is this nonsense?
I have a law degree. "
“Wait a minute,” I wrote back.
- Legal education legal education.
Where's the two-year experience? "
I had known Navalny by that time for several years.
We were on a pretty level friendly relationship.
But I had no idea that he had once worked as a lawyer.
And do you know what Navalny did when I asked him this question?
Nothing.
He did not answer me.
I asked the question publicly.
The answer is silence.
I asked it over and over.
And at some point, Navalny simply banned me.
Then it turned out that he had received two years of legal experience working as a deputy for the legal part of ... himself!
In my own company.
And he issued a certificate to himself.
These fifteen hundred characters above are a clear and understandable explanation of why Navalny ceased to be for me who I thought he was before.
A normal guy to deal with.
And he became a petty swindler, who cannot be trusted in every little thing.
Humpty Chatting.
Subsequently, this was confirmed more than once.
And it is from these positions that it is interesting to consider Navalny's last post about how all the king's men cannot catch Humpty Dumpty.
Here are just points - from the very beginning:
“We find the phone of Vladimir Alexandrovich and enter it into the well-known Telegram bot to see how it is written in other people's notebooks.”
Which one is the "well-known Telegram bot"?
I tried three.
None of them gave out any information on my own phone, recorded by many of the 20,000 people subscribed to my channel.
Not to mention the fact that all these bots ask to enter the number in the international format (that is, +7 and the code), and on the screenshot of Navalny, the number is written in the Russian long-distance format (8 and the code).
However, the fourth bot did show me that I was recorded by others as "Maxim Kononenko".
But I was not given any opportunity to verify the number from which all further "investigation" proceeds.
OK.
Next is an episode about the tribune's wife being ill:
“I asked:“ What hurts you?
Heart?
Stomach?
Call an ambulance? "
And Julia herself did not understand and could not explain.
She said: "Nothing hurts."
I decided to return to my room and, as I later found out, I barely reached it, although the hotel was very close. "
The key phrase is "how I found out later."
It's not my business to judge other people's family relationships, but when a person constantly declaring their ideality suddenly admits that he did not even see off his ailing wife, but stayed in a cafe to finish his dinner, this, of course, raises questions.
Not to Navalny, but to that very declared image of an ideal family.
Which comes from the person involved.
Further: "We decided not to tell anyone about the cases yet, but to use this information for investigation."
Who are we?
While Navalny was in an Omsk hospital in an incompetent state, his wife actively communicated with journalists.
She could very well match the symptoms.
Moreover, Navalny claims that he once experienced a similar discomfort before the eyes of his press secretary.
That is, both Yulia Navalnaya and Kira Yarmysh knew that this had already happened.
And when it happened again, they didn't tell anyone about it.
To use the information for an investigation?
By whose direction?
Navalny is in a coma.
Okay.
The next sentence: "So do not hesitate: when I say" went "," flew "and" called ", this is confirmed by tickets, a list of passengers and billing data and cellular geolocation."
In science, an evidential fact is one that is reproduced by an independent experiment.
Personally, I cannot reproduce everything described by Navalny and other publications, because I am not provided with the initial facts.
I am only provided with the results of the interpretation of these facts.
Above, I have already shown this with the example of "the well-known Telegram bot".
So "confirmed" here is just the word of a person who has been repeatedly convicted of lying.
Further: “On the same day Aleksandrov, Osipov and Panyaev buy tickets to Novosibirsk.
In the evening at 21:30 they call the FSB officer on duty at Sheremetyevo airport. "
Why do they call the FSB officer on duty at Sheremetyevo airport?
Let's say you're a doctor.
You bought a plane ticket for business purposes.
Do you call the airport medical unit before your flight?
It looks like an attempt to connect facts that are not very related.
Here's another: “August 20.
I am waking up.
I get dressed.
I drink water from a bottle, leave my room and at 6 am I meet with my press secretary Kira and assistant Ilya. "
Further, a quote from Novaya Gazeta: “When exactly Navalny touched the bottle - in the morning or in the evening - it is not known.
The politician himself does not remember this, said one of the FBK employees.
So does he remember about the bottle or not?
Who's lying?
Navalny again: "They forbid me to take me to a hospital in Germany and they wait, either until I die, or until there are no traces of Novichok on my body."
And another quote: "Yes, it happened: Putin asked the gouges in a secret institute:" How long will the Novichok dissolve in the body? "
They scratched their heads and said: "Well, in two days."
Alexei Venediktov, editor-in-chief of the Echo of Moscow radio station, who took part in organizing Navalny's export to Germany: “Within three hours of the request, the Federal Border Guard Service of the FSB, the Ministry of Foreign Affairs give permission for a foreign plane to fly to Russia.
Does it happen without a president?
Once again: three hours.
Have you ever tried to get your flight documents?
Well, listen, this is a surprise for the listeners of Echo of Moscow, for 12%.
Wait, it's obvious.
Of course it's obvious.
Anyone watching will see this.
About departure.
Obviously, the evacuation of Alexei Navalny was also supposed to receive a return flight of the plane.
And the evacuation of Navalny is Putin's permission.
Well, those to whom it was not obvious until yesterday, they simply (no matter how offended them) are not observant.
Well guys, even I don't understand what we are talking about.
In August, we said everything about it.
And you all heard it. "
Forgive me for such a lengthy quote, but it is fundamentally important because it breaks the important thesis that "they waited until the traces disappear."
Navalny fell ill on the morning of August 20, Thursday.
Venediktov claims that all permits for the removal of Navalny were received from the security forces by Friday morning.
This is confirmed by the fact that the plane from Germany arrived on Friday morning.
He could not have arrived without permission.
These permits were given at the highest level.
Moreover, in early December, Navalny's representative took medical documents from the Omsk hospital without any problems.
Nobody interfered.
You will say: "And everything has already been corrected there."
Okay, then here's another (quote from The Insider):
“It was to Gorno-Altaysk that Aleksandrov, Osipov and Panyaev also went.
Apparently, it was there that they got rid of things on which traces of "Novichok" could remain.
On August 24, all three flew from Gorno-Altaysk to Moscow. "
What things?
Definitely not Navalny's things, because (it is written in the same place!): “And on 25 August 2020, their colleague Kudryavtsev, a qualified chemical weapons specialist, on the contrary, flew from Moscow to Omsk.
He stayed in the city for less than ten hours and returned to Moscow that same night.
By that time, Navalny was already in Germany, but Navalny's clothes (with traces of "Novichok") remained in the Omsk hospital - apparently, it was Kudryavtsev who flew in for her.
So, what things did the mysterious poisoners get rid of in Altai?
If we see such contradictions in the same text, then what should be our attitude to the reliability of this text?
Or here's another, for example (from The Insider): “These data do not give an unambiguous answer to the question of how exactly the poison was applied, but they fit well with The Insider's previous hypothesis that the“ Newbie ”was applied to underwear, which the oppositionist handed over to the dry-cleaner: the clothes from the hotel's dry-cleaner were brought at the very moment when Navalny went to bathe. "
Let's not even cling to the word “dry cleaning” (there are no dry cleaners in hotels).
And also to the fact that a person who flew in for two nights gives his linen to the laundry (hussars, keep quiet!).
Here is what is important (quote from the Proekt newspaper): “One of the FBK employees told The Project that in Xander the politician gave the dirty clothes to be washed and a bag of clean clothes was hung on the handle of the number.
But it happened on the first day, and then Navalny put on some of his clothes, which makes such a version less likely. "
That is, The Insider is not telling the truth.
A trifle, but unpleasant.
By the way, there is not a word about this underwear in Navalny's long text (hussars, keep quiet!).
But there are a couple of words about “tasteless cocktail” in the hotel restaurant.
Remember where the word "tasteless" comes from?
Of course you don’t remember.
I remember.
“I drank tea, there is not much tea, it is not hot, warm, tasteless,” Alexander Litvinenko told the investigator before his death.
"The tea was somehow tasteless ..." - said Yegor Gaidar after his strange indisposition in Dublin.
"Tolsto" - so they say on the Internet.
Tolsto, Alexey Anatolyevich.
Okay, the text is already long, we need to finish (although there is enough texture).
About atropine:
“The ambulance doctors, assessing Navalny's symptoms, injected him with atropine (which, according to German doctors, saved his life),” writes The Insider.
“Oppositionist Alexei Navalny was not injected with Atropine by ambulance doctors in Omsk.
This was stated by the chief toxicologist of the Omsk region and the Siberian Federal District Alexander Sabaev ... His words were confirmed by the nurse of the Omsk ambulance team Artyom Chernyavsky. "
You can check the medical documents that Navalny's representative took.
Again, not true.
And now (finally) the most delicious.
“A senior German security official has confirmed to The New York Times the accuracy of the details of the investigation into the poisoning of Alexei Navalny.
According to him, the German authorities have known the identity of those involved in the poisoning for several months.
The official also said that shortly after Navalny was evacuated to Berlin, the CIA and the British Secret Intelligence Service informed the German representatives of the details of the poisoning, including the identities of the FSB officers involved, which directly spoke of the involvement of the Russian authorities.
Are you ready?
Let's go.
Investigative journalists, using databases created according to the Yarovaya law (by the way, if anyone does not know, it still does not work), through complex hypotheses and comparisons, they revealed a conspiracy to kill an opposition politician.
And they published it right before the president's press conference.
And officers of the CIA and the British Secret Intelligence Service suddenly say that they knew all this already "soon after the evacuation of Navalny."
Without any databases.
Without "well-known Telegram bots".
But "including the personalities of those involved."
How did they know this?
I didn’t come up with it, it’s the Dozhd TV channel, referring to The New York Times.
You can build the appropriate conspiracy yourself.
The author's point of view may not coincide with the position of the editorial board.