There is such an expression: “It is not a mistake that matters.
The reaction to the mistake is important. "
But what if the reaction is the very mistake?
An intimate video of the leader of the Russian national football team appeared in the public.
Not only were the haters mobilized, but also a completely respectable publication began to consider the video in the hope of a strong hyip.
Considered - haipanuli.
Applause!
I talk a lot about modern digital transparency.
Mark Zuckerberg does not glue cameras on his devices for nothing.
Vaunted smartphones and all sorts of applications promise us 100% security, but, as we can see, all this is nothing more than chatter.
You can see and hear almost everything today, especially if this or that person is the victim of a purposeful hunt.
Are you a celebrity?
Do you have a reputation and a lot of fans?
Well, send us a couple of bitcoins, otherwise we will merge your personal information or a video that you shot exclusively for yourself into the network.
And then we will ask for more and more.
I want to dot the i's once again: Artyom Dzyuba is not guilty of anything.
He did not order a solemn shooting of the holiday with champagne at $ 500 per bottle, did not smash the locker room and did not tear other people's Achilles in a tackle.
Respect for someone else's private life means not discussing this private life, even when you see the video itself, an article or a post on Telegram.
Ideally, of course, there shouldn't be any consequences for Artyom at all.
Unfortunately, modern digital waves cover headlong so that certain costs are inevitable.
Yes, Artyom will miss three games of the national team (which, by the way, will not become stronger from this).
But I'm sure he will come back even angrier and more dangerous for the players of our rivals.
Why do I call the leaking of such videos digital terrorism?
Because its purpose is solely to inflict maximum damage.
The ideal outcome for such terrorists is to destroy the life of their victim.
And the task of law enforcement agencies is to catch and isolate such scum.
Exhorting prudes not to be prudes is useless.
They do not write articles about ordinary fighters of the hate detachments either in gloss or in sports publications.
All that remains for them is to pour out bile, forgetting about what they themselves are doing behind closed doors.
In Russian, there is no analogue to the word privacy.
For 70 years, the Soviet state looked into the bed of its citizens, wanting to control their decency.
Those times are gone forever.
A person's personal boundaries must be strictly guarded.
Punishment for crossing them, and even more so blackmail, should be severe and inevitable.
Respect other people's privacy and count on respect from other people.
Don't think digital terrorism will bypass you.
Today you are watching a video with Artyom, and tomorrow someone will watch a video with you.
If, of course, you are interested in someone.
And the point is not even whether this video or units will collect a million views: merging someone else's video into the network is tantamount to stealing things from someone's house.
With its subsequent demonstration to everyone around.
Support those who fall victim to such leaks.
They are not guilty of anything (I emphasize: of nothing).
The author's point of view may not coincide with the position of the editorial board.