Gone Defendant's Interview "I Can't Accept It" Tokyo District Public Prosecutor Commented on January 9, 2:20
Following a press conference by Nissan Motor's former chairman, Carlos Ghosn, in a fleeing Lebanon in the Middle East, the Tokyo District Public Prosecutor's Office said, `` Ghosn's claim was completely accepted because it unjustified Japan's criminal justice system. No "and posted it on the website in Japanese and English.
Defendant Carlos Ghosn, 65, the former chairman of Nissan Motors, who fled to Lebanon in the Middle East, held a press conference for the first time after fleeing in Beirut, the capital city last night, saying, "Nothing indicted was grounded." He asserted innocence and criticized the Japanese judicial system as "contrarying basic human rights principles."
In response to this, Tokyo District Public Prosecutor's Deputy Attorney-General Takahiro Saito issued a comment early in the morning on Tuesday, stating, "The content of the interview is only an unjustifiable justification for my own conduct. It was a prosecution, and Nissan and the prosecutor's allegation that it was a designed prosecution was irrational and totally contrary to the facts. "
He said that Ghosn's argument unfairly impaired Japan's criminal justice system and would be unacceptable. We will take all possible measures in cooperation with related organizations to bring a trial in Japan.
The Tokyo District Public Prosecutor's issuance of Ghosn's escape is the second time since May 5 that he has posted a comment on the website in Japanese and English, appealing to the international public opinion the legitimacy of the Japanese judicial system. It seems that there is an aim.
Full comment
This is the full text of comments by Governor Saito on Ghoen's press conference.
Defendant Ghosn had fled the country to commit crimes, and the content of this interview is only an unjustifiable justification for his actions.
The defendant Ghosn was arrested and detained for about 130 days, and his access to his wives was restricted under bail conditions, as evidenced by the fact that he later fled and fled by illegal means. The fact that the Ghosn was feared of a high degree of escape and that the wife himself was the party to whom the defendant Ghosn returned funds obtained from Nissan in violation of his duties, and that the defendant Ghosn It is due to the actual conduct of guilty anonymity, such as giving a case to another person involved in the case, and results in the responsibility of Defendant Ghosn himself.
Defendant Ghosn's alleged criticism of Japan's criminal justice system, one-sidedly ignoring the events he committed, unjustly accuses the criminal justice system of Japan.
In addition, the Agency has proceeded lawfully in accordance with Japanese law with proper initiation in each of the offenses by the defendant Ghosn, leading to prosecution.
In the investigation of this case, the prosecution had gathered enough evidence that the defendant Ghosn had committed a high likelihood of being convicted and filed a prosecution, and if there was no crime at all. Defendant Ghosn's allegation that the prosecution was designed by Nissan and the prosecutor was irrational, as it could not have been able to gather evidence that could withstand such an indictment, and is entirely contrary to the facts.
The Agency has made allegations and disclosed evidence along with it for proper trial, and the defendant Ghosn ignored Japanese law, hated being punished, and fled the country. The Agency intends to take all possible measures in cooperation with related organizations to bring defendant Ghosn to trial in Japan.