Nasser Sadiq *
The match between Liverpool and Manchester City, which ended with the first 3-1 victory in round 12 of the English Premier League, witnessed a great arbitration controversy in many cases.
The highlight of the controversy and disagreement among the fans on social media sites the first goal scored by Fabinho in the sixth minute, where Manchester City demanded before him a penalty as a result of a clear hand touch on the Liverpool player inside his area.
Indeed, the ball touched Alexander Arnold's arm, but after touching the arm of Manchester City player Bernardo Silva, in this case denies the touch of the striker's hand after all, where the new amendment introduced by FIFA this season that any hand touch on the striker Preceding a goal or creating a scoring opportunity is considered to be an offense even if it is not intentional, that is, the law has deliberately abolished the hand touches on the attackers only.
Against Liverpool this is not a penalty. Pic.twitter.com/boPPP7SbUG - Mustafa💎 (@mustafaa_MCFC) November 10, 2019 |
Assistant video referee (Var) conceded referee Michael Oliver, who ordered the game to resume and to calculate Liverpool's first goal.
Penalty seen by the blind ... How the referee did not even think to return to the mouse? Is the return of the mouse depends on the mood of the referee? The mouse is not a problem, but the way it is used and applied in England is a big scandal.pic.twitter.com/1rHMdvAh3n - Younis (@Younisation) November 10, 2019 |
The former Syrian international referee Jamal al-Sharif analyzed the situation in another way, stressing in the analytical studio of the BN Sports channels that there is no violation on Liverpool defender, saying that the ball hit the hand of Arnold but after changing direction quickly as a collision in the hands of Silva from close range made him not He can avoid it.
The ball touched Silva's hand before not touching Arnold's hand |
This first shot is before you |
The second argument was that some doubted that Mohamed Salah's second goal in the 13th minute came from a clear offside.
This is the goal of Salah II technology mouse |
However, Silva and Mavi penalty |
Al-Far confirmed the validity of the goal, and the images shown by the verdict of the verdict of the verdict, as it was the moment of passing the ball from Liverpool striker was not a player in any part of his body from the last defender of Manchester City.
___________
* Former international rule