The Personal Status Appeal Court ruled in the courts of Ras Al Khaimah, rejecting a Gulf appellate (or incubator) lawsuit by appointing a guardian for her minor daughter (8 years) in order to preserve, manage and invest her money that she inherited from her deceased father, and the court decided to accept the appeal submitted by the appellant in form and by rejecting it in substance and with support Appealed judgment issued by the Court of First Instance.

The Court of First Instance decided to reject the lawsuit submitted by the plaintiff (the foster mother) by appointing a guardian for her minor daughter and obliging her with fees and expenses, and the legal fees, and also ruled that the defendant (her grandfather) install a legal guardian on the minor child and on the inheritance and inheritance and ordered him to fear God in the child, except that The verdict was not accepted by the appellant, and she appealed against it according to the appeal sheet at the Personal Status Appeal Court, and demanded that the ruling be canceled and the judiciary again accept the lawsuit and the ruling appointing her as a guardian of her minor daughter and that she has the right to preserve, manage and invest her money.

The female appellant explained in the newspaper of the personal status appeal case her appeal against the court ruling, and stated that there was no justification for refusing her claim by requesting her to appoint a guardian to her minor daughter and that it had not been proven that she mismanaged her money or violated the provisions of the law.

She explained that the appellant ruling was tainted by corruption in reasoning because he relied wisely to the memo submitted by the appellant against him without examining the fact that the property and money from cars and homes and a number of commercial licenses were for the deceased and the minor child's father, and that the court had to stand on whether the appellant Against him, conserving these funds or wasting them, and that if he violates one of the conditions of trust, he becomes disputed.
She added that she is aware of the needs and requirements of her minor daughter, and that she meets all the general conditions for her appointment and a guardian, noting that the appellant against him was intransigent in completing the needs of her young money and refuses to exchange any sums of money that have a slander in the appellant due to the judicial disputes between them.

The lawyer asked the appellant against him (the grandfather, the guardian of the incubator), Hanan Al-Bayd, not to accept the newspaper of the appeal case, because the appellant did not submit a defense note during the first session of the court, and she continued that the appellate newspaper was free of the reasons that might be dealt with from the contested ruling, and she claimed that the appellant against him (guardian) Al-Mahdouhna) He owned cars, houses and a number of commercial licenses and does not know the fate of these funds, contrary to the truth.

She asked the court to refuse the appeal and support the ruling of the first degree issued by the court of first instance, because there were no conditions of guardianship terms, and because the application submitted by the appellant did not request it in the lawsuit filed by it before the first degree court in accordance with legal procedures, and the court ruled, after considering the case, accepting the appeal They form and by rejecting an objection and upholding the appealed judgment, and obliged the appellant to appeal expenses and attorney fees.