I formally waived him... and the Ras Al Khaimah court returned him to her

A girl is suing her mother to take back a house she had seized

A Gulf girl led her mother to the Ras Al Khaimah Court to order her judicially to return a house she had fictitiously given up to her mother, in order to obtain another house from a housing project, but her mother refused to return the house to her and stuck to her ownership of it. A copy of the assignment of the ownership of the house as if it was not, and the document of the transfer of ownership is written off from the competent authorities, and it is returned to what it was before the assignment.

In detail, a girl filed a lawsuit in which she stated that she had given up her home to her mother, with the aim of obtaining a house from a housing project, but the defendant refused to return the ownership of the house to her. And the survey is required to consider the formal assignment established in the Ras Al Khaimah municipality, which includes her assignment of the house to her mother, as if it was not, and returning it to her, rescinding and invalidating the assignment contract, and obligating the mother to return the house to her again in the official authorities, and to cross out her name from the real estate ownership records in government agencies.

The mother submitted a newspaper in which she demanded that her daughter be prevented from interfering with her in the ownership and possession of the house, and the court of first degree decided to accept the case in form and reject it as a subject, and to consider the copy of the assignment of the ownership of the house as if it were not, and by erasing and writing off the document of transfer of ownership from the competent authorities, and returning it to what it was before Waiver, and the judgment was not accepted by the mother, so she appealed against it, requesting the annulment of the appealed judgment and the judiciary not hearing the original case with the passage of time, and rejecting it.

The merits of the Court of Appeal ruling stated that it was established in the papers that the girl had filed her claim to request a fictitious waiver contract, which was written between her and her mother, and that the release of the contract was due to her desire not to show her ownership of any house, in order to obtain another house from a housing project, and no price was paid. In exchange for her giving up her home to her mother, she trusted her mother.

She explained that the report of the expert, who was delegated by the Court of First Instance, stated that the girl had paid the price of the house she had bought from her sister, had finished and furnished it, and had given it fictitiously to her mother for free. Any other house, following up that the girl submitted evidence of her application for the grant according to the statement of Ras Al Khaimah Municipality, by way of assignment and not under a sale contract.

She added that there are no cash payments for the plaintiff's waiver of her mother, and that the mother admitted to one of the witnesses that the ownership of the house belongs to her daughter, and the ruling of the first degree was palatable and had a fixed origin in the papers, sufficient to carry out his judgment, and includes the dropped response and does not come out in essence and guaranteed, and that the obituary is It is unfounded, what the judiciary must do by rejecting the appeal, upholding the appealed judgment, and obligating the defendant to pay expenses and attorney fees.

• The Ras Al Khaimah Court ruled that the assignment contract was rescinded and nullified, and the mother's name was crossed out from the property records.

Follow our latest local and sports news and the latest political and economic developments via Google news