A girl leads her mother to court to get her stolen home back

A Gulf girl led her mother to the Ras Al Khaimah Court, to legally oblige her to return a house she had fictitiously ceded to her mother in order to obtain another house from a residential project, but her mother refused to return the house to her and stuck to her ownership of it. A copy of the assignment of the ownership of the house as if it was not, and the document of the transfer of ownership was written off from the competent authorities and returned to what it was before the assignment.

In detail, a girl filed a lawsuit in which she stated that she had given up her home to her mother in order to obtain a house from a housing project, but the defendant refused to return the ownership of the house to her. Considering the fictitious assignment established in the Ras Al Khaimah Municipality, which includes her relinquishing the house to her mother as if it was not and returning it to her, rescinding and nullifying the assignment contract and obligating the mother to return the house to her again in the official authorities, and striking out her name from the real estate ownership records in government agencies.

The mother submitted a newspaper in which she demanded that her daughter be prevented from interfering with her in the ownership and possession of the house. The Court of First Instance decided to accept the case in form and rejected it as a subject matter and to consider the copy of the assignment of the ownership of the house as if it had not been, and to erase and write off the document of the transfer of ownership from the competent authorities and return it to what it was before the assignment. The verdict was acceptable to the mother, so she appealed against it, claiming to annul the appealed verdict and to the judiciary by not hearing the original case with the passage of time and rejecting it.

In the rulings of the Court of Appeal, it was established in the papers that the girl had filed an invitation to request a fictitious waiver contract between her and her mother, and that the release of the contract was due to her desire not to show her ownership of any house in order to obtain another house from a housing project, and no price was paid as part of her waiver. About her home to her mother, and that is her confidence in her mother.

She explained that the report of the expert, who was delegated by the Court of First Instance, stated that the girl had paid the price of the house she had bought from her sister, had finished and equipped it, and had fictitiously ceded it to her mother without compensation. Follow-up that the girl submitted evidence that she had applied for the grant according to the statement of Ras Al Khaimah Municipality, by way of assignment and not under a sale contract.

She added that there were no cash payments for the plaintiff's waiver of her mother, and that the mother admitted to one of the witnesses that the ownership of the house belonged to her daughter, and the judgment of the first degree was justified and had a fixed origin in the papers and sufficient to carry out his judgment and includes the dropped response and does not come out in its essence and is guaranteed and that the obituary on it is not A basis for the judiciary to reject the appeal, uphold the appealed judgment, and obligate the mother defendant to pay expenses and attorney fees.

Follow our latest local and sports news and the latest political and economic developments via Google news