It acquitted him of the assault and canceled his removal from the state
A Gulf Arab resists the policemen ... and the "criminal offenders" imprison him for 3 months
Yesterday, the Ras Al Khaimah Criminal Court ruled that a (Gulf) accused was imprisoned for three months on the charge of resisting police officers and acquitted of the assault charge, and ordered the annulment of his deportation from the state, since his mother is an Emirati.
The Public Prosecution charged him with resisting the policeman to prevent him from completing control, after he was caught in the case of burning a farmhouse, and beating a public official by pushing him with his foot and causing injuries that could be treated for 21 days.
The court had ruled on the accused in absentia to punish him with three months in prison for the charges against him, obligated him to pay 100 dirhams, and ordered his removal from the state after the execution of the punishment, but the defense requested a retrial, because he was not informed of the date of the session, and the court agreed to the request.
The case papers stated that the accused provoked the investigation officers by raising his hands up, and he refused to put the restraint in his hands, and he went to the reception hall in the center and wanted to ignore the policemen and flee, and attacked the policemen while they were trying to enter the room, which caused the injury of one of the individuals. With his left foot.
The defense attorney for the accused, Hanan Al-Bayadh, said before the court that her client is innocent of the charges against him, based on the absence of criminal intent in the first and second charges, which are resistance to a public official and infringement on his safety, in addition to the unreasonability and difficulty of believing the accusation, the maliciousness of the accusation, and the absence of The papers There is evidence other than the statements of the witness and his colleague at work.
She explained that the defendant's mother is Emirati, which gives him the right to request the cancellation of the deportation ruling issued against him in accordance with the provisions of Article 121 of the Federal Penal Code, which states that “A foreigner may not be sentenced to deportation if he is a spouse or a relative of first-degree lineage to a citizen, unless he is The verdict was issued for a crime affecting the security of the state, »that it achieves family stability, establishes and promotes human values and coexistence, and above them in the principalities of tolerance.
Follow our latest local and sports news, and the latest political and economic developments via Google news