A Gulf Arab resists the policemen ... and the "criminal offenders" imprison him for 3 months
Yesterday, the Ras Al Khaimah Criminal Court ruled that a (Gulf) accused was imprisoned for three months on the charge of resisting police officers, acquitting him from the assault charge, and ordering the revocation of his deportation from the state because his mother is an Emirati, and the Public Prosecution charged him with resisting the policeman to prevent him from completing control after his arrest In the case of burning a farmhouse, and beating a public official by pushing him with his foot and causing him injuries that could be treated for 21 days.
The court had ruled on the accused in absentia to punish him with three months' imprisonment for what was assigned to him of the charges and obligated him to pay 100 dirhams and ordered him to be deported from the state after the execution of the sentence, but the defense requested a retrial because he was not informed of the date of the session, and the court agreed to the request.
The case papers stated that the accused provoked the investigation officers by raising his hands up and refused to put the handcuffs in his hands and went to the reception hall in the center and he wanted to ignore the policemen and flee, and also attacked the policemen while they were trying to enter the room, which caused the injury of one of the individuals with his left foot. .
The defense attorney for the accused, Hanan Al-Bayadh, said before the court that her client is innocent of the charges against him, based on the absence of criminal intent in the first and second charges, which are resistance to a public official and infringement on his safety, in addition to the unreasonability and difficulty of believing the accusation and the absence of papers from there Evidence is only the statements of the witness and his colleague.
She explained that the defendant’s mother is an Emirati, which gives him the right to request the annulment of the deportation ruling issued against him in accordance with the provisions of Article 121 of the Federal Penal Code, which states that “A foreigner may not be sentenced to deportation if he is a spouse or a relative of first-degree lineage to a citizen, unless he is The verdict was issued in a crime against state security, “that it achieves family stability, establishes and promotes human values and coexistence, and above it in the principalities of tolerance.
She added that the amendment of the law bears indications of concern for the family and its cohesion as a pivotal component of the state’s strategy, which strives to preserve the family’s fabric and create a decent life for it, in addition to the positive image it reflects on the principle of tolerance that the state has made its approach to it.
She demanded that her client be innocent of the accusation against him and the annulment of the previously issued sentence of three months imprisonment and his deportation from the country, and the abolition of the deportation measure, since the mother of the accused holds the Emirati nationality.
Follow our latest local and sports news, and the latest political and economic developments via Google news