Repeated signing and heading up, and squeezing water when resuming production
-Editorial
The more in the special period when the pressure of economic development is relatively greater, the more we must try to avoid the moisture of various forms of formalism.
In order to appear lively and beautiful, a project signing ceremony was carried out three times; for the satisfaction of superiors, the rate of resumption of work was disregarded according to the reality, the higher the better; in order to express attention, high-profile enterprises were engaged in on-site office, but nothing was done afterwards ... Half a month ago, it was reported that in order to give relief to the economy under the influence of the epidemic, some places did not recruit many people and did a lot of work. They did some stupid things that thought the leaders were satisfied but disappointed the enterprise. Not only did they waste financial funds and consumed grassroots officials. The energy of work makes the company tired to cope with it, and even induces a comparison psychology, breeds a false wind, and misleads governments at all levels to make decisions.
The phenomenon that local governments are repeatedly signing contracts in attracting investment is not new. Earlier it was reported that some provinces and cities have attracted investment into a show, and some projects have repeatedly signed "one or two at least, and four or five times at most", with tens of millions of investment packaged into hundreds of millions. This approach is undoubtedly a typical formalism. However, the latest report shows that “this type of contracting phenomenon has intensified since the new coronary pneumonia epidemic”, and some places have also “injected water” for the resumption of work and reproductive rates. At present, it is the critical stage of resumption of production under the normalization of epidemic prevention and control. Whether it is the phenomenon of repeated contract signing or falsification to achieve the resumption rate, it is all about "water injection" for resumption of production and must be vigilant enough.
Affected by the epidemic situation and changes in the internal and external environment of economic development, the current local pressure on economic development is objective. The central government has also clearly requested that the difficulties should be estimated more fully and the challenges be better understood. However, he did not hesitate to engage in contracted performances and digital games to show the "development results" and the results of resuming production and resuming production.
This not only does not help the real economic development, it creates a false prosperity, but also hinders the higher government's research and judgment on the actual situation of the local economic development, there is the possibility of misleading decision-making. At the same time, it is also easy to produce the effect of "bad money expelling good money"-not engaging in digital games or repeated signing contracts, but may be affected in the assessment of political performance because the numbers are "ugly". Over time, the distortion of the normal development concept should not be underestimated. Therefore, the more during the special period of relatively high economic development pressure, the more we must avoid the water of various forms of formalism.
In fact, in recent years, the central government has significantly strengthened its governance of formalism in economic development. Not only have three orders been made for banning formalism, but economic data in some places have also been revised. The reform of unified accounting for GDP, which has been implemented since the beginning of 2020, has the direct purpose of minimizing the moisture in the past local economic accounting. In this context, signing performances and water-injection reinstatement and reinstatement still occur, warning that the wind of formalism in economic development should also be pursued by victories and targeted efforts to strengthen governance.
For example, due to the objective impact of the epidemic situation, the progress of resumption of production in some places and industries is still relatively lagging. Therefore, we should fully consider the reality, and cannot blindly pursue a unified evaluation of resumption of production. At the same time, to promote resumption of production, we should clearly The actual interests of the enterprise are given priority. For example, some enterprises are affected by the overseas market and the order quantity is insufficient. If they are required to resume work, they may "more production and more losses", which not only exacerbates the pressure of the enterprise, but also does not benefit the actual economic development. In addition, local investment attraction indicators should also be actively adjusted against the objective economic environment and adjusted to suit local conditions. If the assessment indicators are unrealistic, it is inevitable to encourage a project to sign 3 times and wait for the digital game.
While effectively blocking the “partial door” for formalism to resume work and resume production, local governments should also open up the “front door” to promote economic development, truly anxious for enterprises, and implement the state ’s burden reduction and support policies for enterprises. . Since the outbreak, a series of policies to help enterprises have been issued from the central government to local governments. However, media reports show that in some places, "the problems reflected by the enterprise are positively responded on the surface, but no one actually solves it." "It is often because the slogans are loud, and the position is good, but there is no action." This enlightens that for the implementation of various favorable policies, it is advisable to have follow-up evaluation and supervision, and that the formalism and perfunctory style of Yang Fengyin should be blamed.
Not long ago, the central government issued a clear statement on the continuous resolution of the problem of formalism that plagues the grassroots, effectively united the responsibility for the upper and lower responsibilities, and never did the stupid thing that disappointed the masses because they were satisfied with the leadership. Repetitive signing, regardless of the actual one-sided pursuit of resumption of work and productivity, is to do "the stupid thing that thinks the leader is satisfied but disappoints the company." To promote effective resumption of production and production, and to minimize the impact of the epidemic on the economy and society, we should start by effectively eliminating such "stupid things."