The court obliged the owner of the company to return the amount

A fraudster deludes a merchant that he is the owner of a company and seizes 63 thousand dirhams from him

The criminal court fined the defendant 5000 dirhams.

archival

A fraudster succeeded in deceiving a merchant that he was the owner of an iron supply company and seized 63,000 dirhams from him on a promise to supply 49 tons of iron. followed the plaintiff.

In detail, a merchant filed a lawsuit against the owner of a company, asking him to oblige him to return him 63 thousand dirhams and legal interest and 5,000 dirhams in compensation for the damages he sustained, noting that the defendant seized 63 thousand dirhams after deluding him that he owned a company for the sale of iron, and agreed with him to He purchased 49 tons and deposited the amount in the defendant's account, but he delayed and did not deliver the iron, and he was convicted under a penal verdict and fined 5000 dirhams.

The court stated that what was evident from the papers was the conviction of the defendant in the criminal case for the charge of seizing the cash owned by the plaintiff, by using fraudulently to pretend that he had a company to sell iron and was able to seize the amount delivered to him in order to buy iron, and the illegal act was the subject of This judgment is the one on which the plaintiff relies in his present case.

She pointed out that the evidence from the papers was the defendant's conviction for the charge of seizing the amount of 63 thousand dirhams owned by the plaintiff and transferred to him to purchase 49 tons of iron, and there was nothing to refute or contradict this evidence, and then the defendant is responsible for refunding the amount to the plaintiff, which must be With the plaintiff's answer to his request.

Regarding the request for compensation in the amount of 5000 dirhams, the court explained that the defendant’s mistake was proven by his failure to implement his agreement with the plaintiff or refund the amount. An amount of 63,000 dirhams, obligating him to compensate the plaintiff with 5,000 dirhams, in addition to obligating him to pay fees and expenses, and all other requests were rejected.

Follow our latest local and sports news and the latest political and economic developments via Google news