A man loses 658,000 dirhams in a fake project with a friend

A man accused his friend of fraud and the appropriation of an amount of 658,200 dirhams, after he deluded him into participating in a project to buy cars from abroad and sell them in the country. After a while, he discovered that the project was fictitious and did not exist on the ground, while the Abu Dhabi Family Court and Civil and Administrative Claims rejected the case.

In the details, a man filed a lawsuit against his friend, requesting that he pay him 658,200 dirhams and legal interest, explaining that the defendant asked the plaintiff to enter into a business partnership with him to “buy cars from abroad”, which called him to transfer 658,200 dirhams. Through his account in one of the banks, but after a while he discovered that there was no commercial project in the first place, and when he asked the defendant to return the amount he had owed, he supported his claim in the form of a bank statement, the identity and residence of the defendant, while the defendant did not attend during the hearing of the case, despite his legal declaration .

In the ruling, the court stated that it is legally established that the plaintiff must prove his right, and the defendant has the right to deny it, because the burden of proof falls on the plaintiff, and that he is legally charged with proving his claim, providing evidence that confirms what he claims, and that the trial court is not obligated to assign the opponent Provide evidence of his defense or draw his attention to the requirements of this defense.

She indicated that it is established that the plaintiff filed his lawsuit to claim the amount of 658 thousand and 200 dirhams, based on the fact that the defendant received it from him through a number of bank transfers, but that the case papers were void of evidence of indebtedness, and the court did not find out from him except the transfer of funds from him to the defendant , pointing out that the plaintiff is charged with proving his claim and establishing evidence for what he claims, and he did not provide evidence of that, with the submitted documents being insufficient to prove the subject matter of the case except for the transfer of funds and depositing them in the name of a person, and the papers were devoid of any evidence to support the plaintiff in what he claims regarding his entitlement to the amount claimed, and the plaintiff did not request any method of proof, and thus he has established his claim on statements sent that have no evidence from reality, and the court ruled to reject the case in its case, and obligated the plaintiff to pay fees and expenses.

Follow our latest local and sports news and the latest political and economic developments via Google news