Questions and concerns behind Facebook's decision to merge Messenger, Entgram and Wassab

New York Times reports that Facebook is integrating all messaging platforms - Messenger, Entragam and Wassab - into a single infrastructure, and services will remain separate, but backlinks between the three applications will grow into a single messaging platform. Relating to monopoly and violation of privacy.

According to the report, Facebook will add end-to-end encryption to all services - something that has already become standard in WatSab - and means increased privacy and security of direct messages via Instagram and Facebook Messenger.

According to the newspaper, Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg stands behind this initiative, pushing for deeper integration between messaging services, both in terms of technical and corporate performance.

Zuckerberg had promised Integral and Wassab companies a relative independence when Facebook acquired them, but increased control of both companies by Facebook and Zuckerberg himself led to the departure of the original leaders of both companies.

For its part, Facebook did not deny the report, told the New York Times that it wants to build the best of its correspondence experiences, and "people want to be fast, simple, reliable and private messages."

According to the report, the project is currently under way, and Facebook hopes to integrate the three messaging applications by 2020.

On the other hand, the Web site of the technical affairs of the company, that Facebook has a business to link these platforms, the popularity of the site has diminished, especially among the younger users, but Entagram remains a thriving social network, and Wassab continues to grow and is a popular messaging application at the international level, By linking all of these services together, Facebook may have better access, analysis and advertising to its entire audience at the same time.

Questions and criticisms
However, this step also raises questions for users about the meaning of this integration. Unlike Facebook, users of Wattab and Instagram are required to use real names; if a Wattab account does not have a Facebook account, will its real name be automatically detected in the Facebook account?

The ongoing scrutiny of Facebook as a monopoly has grown in recent months, there are calls for "company split", and it is not clear how it will technically affect the integration of all Facebook companies into one giant correspondent company to this debate, but may add to the argument that Facebook runs one integrated product, and does not have monopoly control over disparate competitors, according to Mashable.

This Facebook initiative seems to have provoked a backlash from Watsab's employees, according to Mesapel, who are not sure what Zuckerberg intends to insist on.

"That's why there should have been much more scrutiny during Facebook's acquisitions of ING and VASAB, which now looks as clear as it did," he said in a tweet on Twitter. Horizontal integration practices must lead to antitrust scrutiny. "

"Imagine how the world would look different if Facebook had to compete with Entsagram and Wassab, which would encourage real competition that would have enhanced privacy and benefited consumers."

"I have a lot of questions about how Facebook intends to integrate these services, and if you do anything to weaken security, encryption and encryption, it's a blow," said Biden. Strong security for millions of people around the world. "