The Abu Dhabi Court of Cassation rejected an appeal by an accused to seize a bank card owned by a woman and to seize her money after she handed it over to her to close her bank account outside the state. He was sentenced to one year in prison and a fine of 10,000 dirhams was suspended. The legal fee due, with the order to confiscate the insurance.
The details of the case indicate that the complainant owns an apartment in the Emirate of Abu Dhabi, rents it and asks the accused "resident of the state" to help her rent because she does not reside in the state. When she went to the bank to open an account, the defendant put his phone number in the bank account statements The account was followed up as a non-resident in the country. He then took the amount of AED 407 thousand from her account after he was interested that her account would be closed unless she came to the country or sent him her ATM card.
Investigations indicated that the victim was sent to the accused with her bank card with one of his acquaintances, and then informed her that he was able to withdraw the money and close the account and tried to discourage her from returning to the state on the grounds that her visa had been refused due to a problem related to her. His fraud and his taking over money from his account and using his bank card to buy online, in addition to renting the apartment several times and taking possession of the rent for himself.
The Public Prosecution has estimated that the defendant, and another unknown person, used a valid custom code owned by the victim and used it to seize the victim's money and bank card, which she had handed over to the agency, to close her bank account in a state bank. Grab cash and buy some products in the country while abroad.
In the course of the investigations, the defendant denied that he had taken the money of the complainant, claiming that he was the one who originally demanded it at 400 thousand dirhams, while the examination report showed that the signature on the apartment contract contained in the signature of the lessor and the complainant and the bank statement attached and return to the complainant, His entry and exit movements show that several cash amounts were withdrawn from the bank's account in the UAE while abroad.
The Abu Dhabi Court of First Instance ruled that the defendant was convicted of the crimes he was assigned to commit and sentenced to one year in prison with a three-year prison term from the date of the sentence and a fine of 10,000 dirhams. And on the subject by rejecting and supporting the appeal.
This court did not accept the acquiescence of the convicted person. In this case, his lawyer filed a lawsuit against the appellant. The appellant pleaded guilty to the misguided judgment of negligence and corruption in the inference,
The ruling of the court pointed out that what is raised by the appellant is no more than an objective debate that is not accepted by the Court of Cassation, which is the whole appeal on grounds that must be rejected. The court ruled that the appeal should be rejected.