<Anchor>

The prosecution, which has faced such difficulties, is gaining a lot of insight into the fact that this justice farmer case is a systematic crime of the court administration office in order to prove the open competition relationship that the court does not recognize. In particular, it has been confirmed that we have found the definitive evidence that Yong Sung-tae's lawyer conspired to organize in order to send a trial to a specific court in accordance with his appetite.

This was the sole coverage of reporter Lim Chong-jong.

<Reporter>

The prosecution secured a so-called 'Lee Kyu-jin'

Judge Lee Gyu-jin, who is a judge of the Supreme Court of the Supreme Court, is a business notebook that records the date of the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court and the contents of poetry,

Prosecutors have recently found a definitive clue to the alleged manipulation of the appellate dividend in the lawsuits filed by the unified Progressive Party lawmakers.

The case was numbered on Dec. 4, 2015, and the same case number was recorded in Lee Kyu-Jin's notebook that was written a few days ago.

The prosecution is seeing evidence of a circumstantial circumstance that has been manipulated under the influence of the administration, as the court administration already knew the case number before the event dividend, which is the principle of random lottery, was realized.

The judge stated in the prosecution's investigation, "It is the record of the internal meeting of the administrative office at the time."

The prosecution is investigating who the meeting participants were at the time.

Judge Lee Gyu-jin insisted on SBS that he did not participate in the manipulation of dividends.

The prosecution has also confirmed whether the administrative division has been involved in other cases such as the NIS commentary as the circumstances of the court administration's involvement in the electronic dividend process have been confirmed.

(Video coverage: Tae Hoon Kim, video editing: Chang Hyun Ki)