It happened at a girls' high school in Seoul that has a history of more than 100 years. (▶ [Solo] high school girls "Teachers can not tolerate sexual harassment" vs. school "factless" / 12.06 8 News)


Fifteenth grade students in this school posted about 80 books on the campus at 7:50 in the morning of the 4th. It was composed of 4 chapters, titled 'Apology and Punishment by Sexual Harassment Teachers are Required.' They also claimed that the actual teachers had remarks to their students and also included the time and context in which each statement was made.
Students allege that as soon as students donated their grandparents, the school removed all their administrative and security staff in 30 minutes. The students restored 100 books in the morning, and the school removed them again. It was a two-day period of turmoil where the protesters were attached and released.

■ Students "I could not speak because of the vigor ... because it is weak"

I was able to meet the students who heard the above remarks in the process of receiving reports from the anonymous SBS news viewers about the confusion. There were students in the third grade who were relatively free of testimony and who were ready to graduate after the SAT was finished. The testimonies of several students, rather than one, were largely consistent. Some teachers have continued to say inappropriate words. The students explained the situation of the statement in the grand schedule more specifically, and also spoke what was not in the grand schedule.

▷ Student A: "I have had so many face evaluations, why is a pretty girl so frustrated, or if you ask a student to ask for a self-study, then please let yourself be alone. When I saw him sitting in the mix, he said, "I'm sure freshmen are fresh and fresh."

▷ Student B: "Because of the typhoon this year, our school festival has been postponed for a week, and as I mentioned in my class, I was ready to serve as the first grade and second year students to welcome boys to the school. "I felt so angry that our school festival was not a part of the students' voluntary participation, but as a service for boys."

▷ Student C: "My teacher is so beautiful, 00, why is my mother not beautiful, and my dad is pretty?" And so I talked to my parents about that and I went to ask questions after class. I asked him if he came out suddenly and asked him if he came out to come over. He pulled his hand so that I would be dragged, and I was angry and blushed with his face. "
▷ D Student: "I thought that my skin was not good. Then I asked why, and suddenly I stabbed my face with my hand. As soon as I entered the class, sing my name and sing it. I do not like it. I did it without hesitation. "

▷ E Student: "I was in the class early in the morning when I was alone in the classroom, when the teacher suddenly came in and I was sitting right, but I sat down straight and swabbed my spine and touched my back.

When I asked why I had not said anything in the meantime, the first grader replied, "My teacher said, 'I have to look good on me, I'm good at it.' I talked like this, but in that case, I was weak so I could not speak well."

The students attached their grandmother and said that as the controversy grew in the school, the teachers seemed to realize that they had problems with their speech. However, instead of apologizing in class, he said that he was "unfair", "it was not his intention", "you were sensitive and wrong," and he was hurt more. So the students dismissed the three teachers who were often overtaken by words and phrases and insisted that the rest of the teachers should have appropriate discipline. However, the sympathizers who interviewed the students said that they dismissed most of the requirements, saying that dismissal is not the responsibility of the person but the authority of the board and that disciplinary action against other teachers is also necessary.

■ School "I can not confirm the fact"

The reporters went to the school directly to hear the position of the school. The school staff explained that the principal and vice principal were not on schedule for external training. At the end of the day, I was waiting for the head of the department of the school affairs.

After that, I got a call with the person in charge of the school, and I was able to ask for admission. He explained that he was blamed for not having good communication with the students, but he was constantly talking with the students, so he told them to refrain from reporting. He added, "I know that students have been raising issues since last March, and when they are not true, teachers will have a hard time." "I was not able to confirm the fact" about the contents of the newsletter. It is said that there is a side where students are unilaterally claiming to be in the 'mite' atmosphere recently.
The reason why the reporters were forced to report on the school 's request to refrain from reporting was as follows. The fact that many students who were not in the same grade and grade consistently testified (there were graduates), and the demand for students to complain through the SNS and correct the problem has continued since March.

In particular, it was difficult to dismiss them as a one-sided claim from the point of view of the fact that there was a collective action such as grand-war. However, because there is a possibility of distortion of the statement, and there are differences in the subjective feelings of both sides when considering the situation of the situation and the context, I also paid attention to protecting the honor of the school or the teacher.

As a news reporter, I hope that the school in its historical past will solve problems wisely, with a more active attitude with students.