The “Civilian of Ras Al Khaimah” obliged him to pay 7,000 dirhams to the groom

“Wedding kosha” leads a party caterer to court

The “Court” obligated the defendant to return the amount after it was proven that he had breached his contractual obligations.

From the source

A wedding party contractor breached his pledge to install a “wedding kosha”, a day before the date of the (Gulf groom’s) wedding, despite receiving 7000 dirhams out of a total of 11,400 dirhams, to install a “wedding kosha” and wedding supplies. He must pay the plaintiff 7,000 dirhams, in addition to fees and expenses.

In detail, the plaintiff stated in the lawsuit, that he agreed with the defendant to install the "kosha" and the wedding supplies, a day before the wedding date, but the defendant did not attend, and did not install the "kosha", despite his communication with him.

He demanded that he be obligated to pay him the first installment of the amount received, and obligate him to pay fees, expenses and attorney's fees.

The case papers indicated that the plaintiff attended the trial session, and the defendant did not attend, and accordingly the court reserved the case to pronounce the verdict, and stated in its text that the first article of the Evidence Law in Civil and Commercial Transactions provides for the plaintiff to prove his right, and the defendant has the right to deny it, as stipulated in Article 113 of The law: “The creditor must prove his right, and the debtor must deny it.”

She added that if the creditor proves his debt, the debtor must prove his acquittal, because the original is free of liability, and its preoccupation with it is accidental. in kind or as compensation in accordance with the legal provisions.”

The court added, according to the transfer receipts attached to the lawsuit, and after the parties agreed that the defendant would complete the preparation procedures for the plaintiff’s wedding, it was found that he did not attend and implement what was agreed upon with the plaintiff, despite receiving part of the agreed amount, and the court confirmed that with a testimony The plaintiff's sister, a testimony the court considers to be valid.

She clarified that as long as the plaintiff proves his claim, and the defendant has not demonstrated a violation of the lawsuit, or proved that he has paid the amount in question, it is destined to obligate him to pay 7,000 dirhams to the plaintiff, as long as it is proven that he breached his contractual obligations, and that it is not proven to return the amount he received, and accordingly the court obliges the defendant to It pays the plaintiff the amount, and obligates him to pay the expenses and fees.

Follow our latest local and sports news and the latest political and economic developments via Google news