Nice attack trial: Christian Estrosi defends himself from any breach in security
“No one had considered the unthinkable”, explained Christian Estrosi to the court.
(illustrative image) AFP / JEFF PACHOUD
Text by: RFI Follow
2 mins
At the trial of the Nice attacks, the court heard this Thursday afternoon, Christian Estrosi, mayor of Nice from 2008 to June 2016 then from 2017, who was first security assistant on July 14, 2016. At the heart of his hearing, the question of possible failures to secure the "Prom", the Promenade des Anglais.
This is not the subject of the current trial, but the security system has been the subject of numerous criticisms and questions during the testimony of the civil parties, of which the president has occasionally made himself the spokesperson.
Advertising
Read more
With our special correspondent at the Paris Courthouse,
Laura Martel
From the outset, Christian Estrosi promises not to evade any question, but it is first in a lyrical preamble that he launches, evoking pell-mell a peace agreement signed in Nice in 1538, his childhood memories de la Prom', his emotion at the attack, his closeness to the victims.
Side civil parties, some annoyed sighs are heard.
Coming to the security of that evening, the city councilor, supporting files, cites figures and legislation, affirms that the municipal police were more numerous than in 2015, and above all, returns the responsibility for the device to the State.
The security of major events, he insists, "
is a national competence
", the preparatory meetings were under prefectural authority.
Meetings during which the scenario of a truck attack "
has never been considered
", then points out President Raviot.
"
A posteriori, we can always wonder why we did not imagine what was improbable
" defends Christian Estrosi, recalling that this operating mode was "
a first in Europe
".
And the president relaunches him: and this "
ten locations
" that the terrorist was able to do, despite the video surveillance?
With more than 1,800 cameras, "
impossible for the human eye
" to detect such behavior, but the surveillance made it possible "
to reconstruct the course of the killer
", argues the mayor.
It is therefore "
a very useful device for resolving cases, but the upstream usefulness of which is open to question,
" remarked the president to the man who, after the
Charlie Hebdo
attack , had affirmed that "
if Paris had the same remote surveillance network as Nice, the Kouachi brothers would not have passed three crossroads without being neutralized
”.
►
To read also Nice attack trial: the tragic story of Laura's family
We would like him to tell us the truth, that there weren't enough policemen... As far as we know the truth in this story of protection.
I'm not saying it's his fault, but still, he was mayor, agent too.
Suddenly, they say it's the prefect, suddenly it's President Hollande... We're lost in all that.
Anger and disappointment of the civil parties after the hearing of Christian Estrosi
Yoram Melloul
Newsletter
Receive all the international news directly in your mailbox
I subscribe
Follow all the international news by downloading the RFI application
France
Nice attack
Terrorism
Justice