The deployment of an Egyptian daily newspaper for a series of articles signed under a pseudonym, called «Newton», on a proposal to change the status of the Sinai administrative, stir wide in the Egyptian street, and attacked voices in the proposed Egyptian political street, accusing the articles as «carrying political background mysterious», and Oraha external fingers , while defending limited voices from the right of the newspaper to publish different views, including considered freedom of opinion, and declared «the Supreme Council for the organization of media» for opening an investigation into the controversial articles, in his articles published by the pseudonym himself «partial apology» for put, in an effort It is perhaps the newspaper to contain the crisis.
In detail, the newspaper published «Egyptian today» independent, liberal-leaning, on 12 April, the daily angle predicted pseudonym «Newton», an article entitled «the development of function», stating that «are usually advertised job vacancies apply to Anyone who wants to, to reflect the attempt today with a job proposal that we ask for. ”
The article continued: «job that I propose is (ruler of Sinai), the duration of the contract for six years, surpassing the conservative tasks, Vamahafez restricted ministries, and the function requires independence from the bureaucracy prevailing laws».
He added: «is required to stay away from the Egyptian state budget, will not collect the territory of the Egyptian state, but foreign policy and the defense of the border, and will not waste any time in the invention of new systems, Snstaar systems applied in successful countries in Singapore, Malaysia or Hong Kong».
The newspaper published the following day, another article included letters, she received comments on the first article, including a letter from someone claiming that his name «Persian Imam», he said: «The governor of the region required for the Sinai needs to be personal with special specifications, faces obstacles and difficulties without breach Alguetad, as the Arabs say. First, the most important points gained, by virtue of the political history of the Middle East conflict, situations of special priority, you need to understandings and arrangements to facilitate the project century », as the paper published in the same day, a message to someone who signed on behalf of Abdul-Aziz al-Sharqawi, He said in it: “I add to your suggestion that Sinai be the same way The German obedience of Bavaria has a full ministry, headed by a prime minister and ministers in all specialties, under the rule of the mother authority in Cairo. The message asked, "Does the central authority agree to give Sinai these powers that are similar to autonomy?"
And I created «Newton articles» reactions and wide, and was pointing out that the naysayers team for «Newton articles» included opposition liberals and leftists and independents, also included loyal media, with different reasoning.
Mediamen and lawyers presented communications to the Attorney General and the Supreme Council for the Organization of the Press, demanding that the newspaper first reveal the identity of "Newton".
He wrote the leading member of the Political Bureau of the National Rally of the Progressive Unionist Party (left-wing), Nabil Atris, in his on «Facebook»: «fell an apple on the ground and discovered Newton's law of gravity, and fell thousands of martyrs on the land of Sinai, did not Newton discovers national law».
For his part, editor of Al-Ahram newspaper said former chief, columnist Azim Hammad, said that «the most important positives in the angry reactions on Newton's proposal, in his call to achieve what he calls the start of the development, is the overwhelming consensus on not compromising an inch of Sinai». Hammad However, that «the most important negatives in those responses is to hasten to accuse the author of the proposal of national treason, and in coordination with foreign parties and even local, to prepare for the separation of the Sinai from Egypt».
In turn, the Supreme Council announced the organization of the press to investigate the Egyptian «articles today» to investigate articles «Newton», and was identified Council meeting yesterday to discuss the matter officials necessitating «Egyptian today».
Speaker of the Council, journalist and writer Makram Mohamed Ahmed, anticipated an investigation for a channel
"Cairo and the people," that they are in the council "are not guards to restrict freedom of expression and thought, and they should be an associate party to the press."
"Newton's articles" about "Sinai region" caused wide reactions, and it was noticeable that the team of those who rejected the articles included liberal, leftist and independent opponents, as well as loyal media, with different rationale.