The Army, which is spending 1.7 trillion won to develop and mass-produce the next generation of 15,000 2½ tonne military trucks and 5 tonne bulletproof kit trucks, is constantly inadequate. The Army closed its eyes on the factors of Kia Motors' deduction during the evaluation of operators, and raised the hands of Kia Motors after declining as if it were taking a 'microscope' for Hanwha Defense. All sorts of doubts)

The army has been confirmed to be blatantly sided with Kia Motors even in Congress. If there is noise from a large military project worth $ 1.7 trillion, the National Defense Commission should look at the grassland. Naturally, several members of the National Defense Agency have asked the Army to go face-to-face and ask for relevant data. But the army's reports, data, and logic are spectacle.

● "60 ~ 70 cases are the same as 4-5 cases" and the rainy season is a rare logic of the army

The evaluation of the Army's next-generation 2½-ton military truck and 5-ton bulletproof kit truck project was conducted blind. In order to ensure the objectivity and fairness of the evaluation, the proposal should not contain anything that identifies the business. However, Kia Motors released a press release on September 27, the day after the proposal was submitted, containing specifications of the vehicle and photographs of the vehicle, and at least 60-70 articles were spilled.

The Army's proposal reviewers were able to know the details of Kia's military trucks in advance. The Army Justice Department also concluded that Kia Motors' public relations activities were "damaged by fairness" and "deductions are possible." There is a lot of inability to blind evaluation. However, the Army's proposal evaluation committee did not deduct.

Hanwha Defense, meanwhile, did not issue press releases to participate in the army truck business. Nevertheless, the rumors were prominent, so there were articles about Hanwha Defense's 2½ ton military truck and 5 ton bulletproof kit truck business. Without mentioning the specifications, the contents were "to participate in the business" and "to be held in two pajeon". The number of articles is only four or five.

However, the Army reported to members of the National Defense Agency that "Kia Motors and Hanwha Defense continued to promote their vehicles." Kia Motors has 60 to 70 articles with specifications and Hanwha Defense has 4 to 5 articles without specifications. The Army explained to the National Assembly that "the two companies did the same." Obvious false report.
● Hanwha Defense's vehicle display? The fact is that the proposal and the exhibition vehicle are different.

Kia Motors revealed the vehicle photos in a press release and revealed the actual vehicle before the proposal was evaluated at the Seoul International Aerospace and Defense Exhibition (ADEX). It is the same model that the army suggested. Although this undermines the purpose of blind evaluation, which prevents the identification of companies when evaluating proposals, the Army Evaluation Committee did not deduct.

The army, which had been in a tight position, insisted the National Assembly and the media that "Hanwha Defense had exhibited the next generation of military truck models." Hanwha Defense has also launched a model truck at the weapons exhibition held at the Defense Convention in Yongsan-gu, Seoul. But it's a totally different model from the truck that we proposed to the army.

In order to take part in Kia Motors, which released the exact same vehicle as the proposal, Hanwha Defense, which previously released a model truck that is completely different from the proposal, is languishing. When it comes to evaluating, even after the evaluation is over, the Kia Motors is hoping.

● Hide Kia's proposal!

The army's actions against the call for a proposal to bring a proposal to see if the members of parliament have made a proper assessment are absurd. The Army sent only Hanwha Defense proposals to the National Assembly. Kia Motors' proposal was hidden.

The Army has conducted a legal review of its own and determined that proposals from members of the National Defense Defense Agency are available. An aide to the National Assembly said, "The Army explained that Kia Motors refused to disclose the proposal, saying it was a trade secret," and "Is the Hanwha Defense proposal brought in because it was not a trade secret?"

The Army keeps saying that Kia Motors' selection was made by an independent evaluation committee, and has nothing to do with the army. However, the Army Evaluation Committee is chaired by the Army Logistics Chief of Staff, one Army Project Management Department, one Army Project Management Department, one Army Testing and Evaluation Department, one Navy and Air Force, one Personnel Agency, and one Agency for Defense Technology and Quality. It consists of one person and one private automobile research institute. Army-led evaluation committee.

Even if the army evaluated fairly, it was likely that Kia Motors won the business in the first place. The army, however, was unreasonably unfairly cheapened and rounded up Kia Motors and handed over its development rights. There is a good reason behind unreasonable behavior. There seems to be some inadequate situation for the army to tie his neck to Kia Motors. So far, I have reported various suspicions through the SBS 8 news and the report file, and it turned out to be true. There are still some doubts that are hard to believe.