Drivers asked to reconsider the calculation of compensation or fees for reckless pedestrians who cross the roads from non-pedestrian crossings, especially on highways, noting that some pedestrians cross the roads suicidal, from places where there are no bridges or infantry lines, , Demanding that they be held responsible for endangering their lives.

The lawyer, Ali Abbadi, that the crossing of the wrong pedestrian from the unallocated places lose them the right of compensation and parentage, in case of damage, unless the offender disrupts the safe driving procedures of the vehicle, such as speed and take caution and caution according to the law.

The drivers' claims came in the context of a video recently published by Abu Dhabi Police in five languages ​​on their social networking accounts. One of the pedestrians was crossing a dangerous road, endangering his life.

Abu Dhabi Police warned individuals of the dangers of pedestrian crossing from uninhabited areas so as not to be run over, calling on individuals to commit to proper passage through footpaths, tunnels and bridges for their safety, and to pay attention to telephone when crossing roads.

Traffic accidents in the country show that the lack of priority for crossing pedestrians is one of the main causes of traffic accidents, and ongoing police campaigns have resulted in the release of thousands of irregularities for pedestrians who crossed the road from outside the designated areas.

Drivers are demanding that pedestrian punishment be increased from uninhabited places to reduce accidents of innocent victims every year, unaware of the seriousness of their behavior, noting that the law imposes liability on those responsible and requires them to pay compensation or money to the family of the deceased, Wrong roads.

They called for the construction of more fences on the road islands, to prevent pedestrians from crossing unattended areas, and to install surveillance cameras for such behavior, and to rely on them if an accident occurred to a passer-by and to prove his legal responsibility for the incident.

They proposed broad campaigns in different languages, especially for the Asian communities, many of whose members are intent on crossing the roads from unallocated places, as well as reconsidering the recognition of compensation for the passing of a passageway if it is proved to pass from the unallocated location.

For his part, the lawyer, Ali al-Abbadi, that compensation and parents are legally and legitimately, based on the words: «And was a believer to kill a believer except a mistake and killed a believer mistake, free the neck of a believer Muslim friendly to his family but believe».

Al-Abbadi said that the law obligates those responsible for the killing of pedestrians to pay the blood to the victims' victims, if it is proven that they did not take care while driving, which caused the accident.

He said that if the court found that the victim misled pedestrian lines from the unallocated places, the court gave the court the right to rule that he would not be entitled to the money after making sure that the person responsible for the incident complied with the traffic laws related to speed, caution and sound driving according to the law.

He pointed out that if the driver was found to have exceeded the prescribed speed, and he did not comply with the traffic instructions, and at the same time, the victim did not commit to pass from the place designated for the crossing of the infantry, the responsibility is shared between the driver and the transient in the composition of the elements of tort. The rate of participation of the victim in error.

Over the past years, state courts have considered cases of infantry abuse, in which drivers were held responsible for manslaughter, and ordered them to pay full money to the victims' families.

In other cases, the Supreme Federal Court was considered a partner in the incident, and the value of the prescribed fatality was reduced by the amount of error it committed, after it was found that the victims had contributed to their mistake in passing the incident by crossing the road other than the places intended for pedestrian crossing.

In its case last year, the Federal Supreme Court overturned a ruling by the Federal Court of Appeal, acquitting a driver driving his vehicle at 120 kilometers per hour and causing a runway that led to his death.

The Supreme Federal Court, in the merits of the case, asserted that the participation of the victim in error does not exempt the driver from liability, explaining that the decision of the provisions of Islamic law that the participation of the victim in error does not absolve the responsibility of the participant, It is in error, since it has helped him to himself, because doing in himself is a waste, and then reduced the amount of fat by the mistake of the victim, and spend the rest of those who participated in the act wrong.

Fine AED 400

The Ministry of the Interior has increased the fine of pedestrians crossing the road from unoccupied areas, from 200 to 400 dirhams, according to the latest amendments to the Traffic and Traffic Law, the Violations Schedule and the Regulations.

Article 89 of the amended offenses table stipulates two violations, the first "pedestrian crossing of the road other than the places designated for their passage, if any", and the second "non-compliance by pedestrians with light signals" and a fine of AED 400 each.

Consolidation of safety and security values

Abu Dhabi police have recently installed a number of Hathar devices in pedestrian crossing places on the streets of Abu Dhabi as part of a visionary plan for optimal use and employ artificial intelligence programs to prioritize pedestrian crossing in their designated areas.

The first phase of the plan includes the installation of "Hazeer" in pedestrian crossing points near schools and other traffic-intensive roads to establish security and traffic safety values, creating a safe environment and advanced capabilities to protect road users from various types of hazards.

The Hazeer system is a two-way display system, one for vehicles coming into the pedestrian passage, one for pedestrians, two cameras, the first for vehicle signage, the second for visual analysis, and a central processing unit to monitor the pedestrian passage and its surroundings.