The Criminal Court of Ras Al Khaimah heard yesterday the defense lawyers' statements and the statements of a negative witness in the case of the accusation of an elderly citizen of the Gulf nationality to initiate the rape of a girl of Arab nationality and her defamation of coercion with a threat accompanied by a request, Bhattak introduced the girl and dropped her pants and threatened to kill her if she told anyone about the incident. The child's father said in police investigations and the prosecutor's office that he had been exposed to attempted rape and debauchery due to involuntary urination and depression.
The defendant's defense lawyer asked the court during his pleading before the court to present the accused to a medical committee to examine him if he had a sexual disability that prevented him from practicing sexual relations, explaining that the charges against his client to initiate the rape required preparation for the act while his client suffered from a sexual disability that prevented him from Commit a crime or even think about it.
He explained that he requested that his client be acquitted of the charges against him because there was no evidence that the accused had committed the crime. The father of the victim had delayed the submission of the communication for four months, contradicting the victim's statements in the police and public prosecution investigations and in the psychiatrist's report, Age.
He added that if the defendant had any bad behavior in his actions when his wife asked to host the girl and her family At home and endanger the child's safety.
He pointed out that his client agreed to host the girl and her family after one of the neighbors refused to host them and asked them to leave the house because he was upset about their presence. He said that after the child returned to her family's home and her mother left the hospital, her family continued to visit the defendant's house, The victim did not agree to go with her family to visit the accused for fear of repeated harassment of the accused and raped or similar.
He stated that the victim's statements in the investigations were sent and not seen by anyone accompanied by the accused in the house during an attempt to rape her and escaping from the bathroom of the room that she was with him, according to her words. He pointed to the father of the girl who reported in the police investigations and the Public Prosecution that his daughter was infected with urination and depression After the incident, and that the report of the psychiatrist who revealed the girl did not mention that rape or abuse lead to involuntary urination or depression, and the report mentioned 12 reasons for the occurrence of involuntary urination in children without mentioning the exposure to rape or abuse, which denies the health of the strongest Her father in police investigations and prosecutors.
He explained that the victim made her statements in the investigations of the police and the Public Prosecution freely and clearly, but declined to speak or speak in the case before the psychiatrist and she hid behind her father because she felt scared, pointing out that in case the victim is confused or scared, He was caught in police investigations and prosecutors as she was subjected to a rape attempt that caused her fear.
The defendant, who is the sister-in-law of the accused, testified before the court after her swearing-in that the defendant was her sister-in-law and that she had identified the victim after the burning of her family's home four years earlier and her mother's injury. To a hospital in Abu Dhabi for burns.
She explained that the father of the victim was mentioned in the investigations of the Public Prosecutor's Office that she informed him that the accused is bad behavior and has precedents in the case of defamation and similar cases of the victim, and pointed out that all the child's father mentioned in the investigations is incorrect and that she did not inform him of any information about the accused.
She added that each person has behaviors in the youth and that the accused is old and has no precedents or similar cases. She added that she did not see the accused trying to rape or abuse the victim, nor did she hear or see any bad behavior of the accused in the past.
The 13-year-old girl wrote and described the details of the incident in a paper after the social worker at the school asked the students to write a story about their social life and attitudes. The girl wrote that her family's house was completely set fire before four when She was nine years old and her mother had burns all over her body. Her neighbor asked her father to stay in the house because their house was damaged by the fire.
She explained that the owner of the house harassed her and dropped her pants and tried to Htc display, and presented pornographic clips and threatened to kill if she informed anyone from her family, where the social worker was surprised by the content of the story and immediately informed the father of the child who in turn submitted a communication to the competent authorities against the accused.
The defense lawyers demanded that the court defer consideration of the case to see the case papers and prepare to provide defense for the accused. The court set July 24 as the date for hearing the defense case.