The Court of Misdemeanors in the Ras Al Khaimah Court acquitted three sons and their parents of beating and insulting each other as a result of a dispute over a new home. The father refused to move his sons and first wife to live with him at home. , Prompting the father to divorce his wife to drop the right to housing.

According to the indictment, the three accused verbally attacked and threatened his father and insulted his second wife (an Asian national). The father was also accused of insulting and threatening the three children, his daughter and his first wife, and assaulting the body of two of his sons.

The father's defense lawyer, Ramzi the old man, asked the court to acquit his client of the charges against him, for the absence of the criminal intent of the incident, and the defendant did not exceed his limits in the legal and legitimate threat and there was no evidence of the validity of the charges in the case papers.

He explained that his client was a victim of him since the beginning of the incident, and that two of the defendants entered his room and asked him not to transfer his second wife to the new residence. They insisted on transferring their mother to live there.

He added that the defendants reported in the investigation that their father insulted and beat them, although there is no evidence in the case papers for the authenticity of their statements.

The lawyer for the three defendants, Hanan al-Bayd, said that the father's accusations were "malicious" and that "the father invented the crime to prevent them from living in the new house." The father had precedents in the race and assault on his children.

She explained that the second wife of the accused father claimed in the investigations not to speak in Arabic, although she speaks Arabic and learned, and also reported in the investigation that she heard the three defendants insulting their father by telephone, although not in place, it was found in the palm area of ​​Ras Al Khaimah , And that the father was in his home in the northern region of the emirate.

Al-Bayyad asked the court to refer the second wife to the Public Prosecution on charges of "false testimony".

She added that the crime of insulting the three accused of their father is not available, because the first accused his father and his second wife at his home to please his father, even if he wanted to insult or assault him because I live in his home from the beginning. Al-Bayad asked the court to acquit her three agents from the charges against them for the disappearance of the elements of the crime.

The court offered the children reconciliation with their father, and asked him to allow him in the "Year of Tolerance." The accused expressed their desire to do so, and stressed that "this is our father, and there is no problem to reconcile with him."

The father divorced his first wife to lose her right to stay inside the new home.