• Sexual dissatisfaction, self-esteem or fashion problems, not everything is resolved by opening the relationship to third parties

  • From 'love bombing' to 'breadcrumbing', the new diseases of love and how to detect them

  • Why are relationships so short-lived today (is there anything we can do to avoid it?)

We can learn a lot about love by understanding why

many couples choose to stay together

when they no longer share

passion or sex.

It is an uncomfortable and often silenced reality, above all because of the value that our culture places

on erotica.

Paradoxically, in a society where a

great diversity of love discourses

and forms of bonding proliferates, it seems that it is still difficult for us to accept that

couples without sex

can be satisfied and even

fully happy.

But what do we understand as a couple without sex?

A standard definition could be that couple who, in absolute terms, do not have sex or have

erotic encounters with a frequency of less than one in a month.

Behind a couple without sex there are different reasons and contexts.

Although in this definition we would leave out those people who,

due to different situations

or limitations, are prevented from having sex (for example, a couple where one of the members has been left in a coma after

an accident

or a couple where one of the members is going through degenerative diseases such as Alzheimer's).

Just as people can have sex for a variety of reasons, they also choose

not to have it

for many different reasons.

More time together, less sex, and other reasons

For example, it is common for couples to have

less sex over time.

The frequency of sexual encounters is generally much higher at the beginning of the relationship, that is, in the phase of falling in

love,

where intensity and idealization set the pace.

When the infatuation phase ends, couples may notice different experiences.

The first, a loss of fascination for the other, but

maintenance of physical attraction and desire.

The second, a loss of physical attraction towards the partner, although

sexual desire

persists as a need or a motivation that can be fulfilled by the partner, either partially or totally.

Yet another experience, the

loss of sexual desire

due to situations associated

with stress, monotony,

age, the arrival of children, biological changes or the onset of a disease, but the physical attraction towards the partner continues.

The last one,

attraction and sexual desire

they disappear because the couple, for different reasons,

is no longer desirable

(for example, bad communication, infidelity,

carelessness or abandonment in seduction,

different interests, loss of the common life project, contrary values ​​or lack of trust).

Not having sex is not equal to asexuality

Considering the previous scenarios, we can point out how

the lack of interest in sexual activity

with a partner

is not always

related to a

lack of physical attraction

towards it.

Nor to a question that must be reduced

to age

or whether we are facing a mature relationship.

Adults can even compensate for this absence of sex by positively valuing other needs that are covered:

affection, proximity, care,

status, emotional well-being or stability.

Does this mean that these people

are asexual

or have become asexual?

No not at all.

Although asexuality may explain why some couples are not interested in erotic activity, this does not mean that all couples who forego sex do so because they are not interested in such contact or because it aversions them.

Love, much more than passion

Passion

tends to be considered

as an irrational force, as the element that ignites and maintains relationships.

Evidence of physical attraction, the search for pleasure and

immediate enjoyment.

But love is not only built with desire.

Apart from the

romantic ideal,

the one that has been fattening the Hollywood industry for years and, more recently, the successful Turkish soap operas, love needs a strong and shared commitment, a high level of communication and, of course, trust, respect and honesty

. .

The effort

to procure these elements must be

mutual, equitable and constant.

As we have already repeated on other occasions, it is difficult for a relationship to be healthy and satisfactory when reciprocity is dispensed with, when only one of the parties of the couple maintains an interest in caring for the bond.

Now, although some couples do not experience discomfort when sex disappears or deliberately choose to enjoy their relationship by leaving sexual activity out, there are also those who suffer great dissatisfaction

in the absence or infrequency of erotic encounters.

Giving greater value to sexuality and

shared eroticism in the couple

is a relatively recent change.

There is

less taboo, more freedom,

greater acceptance of diversity, less fear or sexual prejudice.

Inalienable eroticism?

As

the meaning of sex

in our society has been redefined, separating itself from the reproductive function and distancing itself from adjectives such as 'dirty', 'immodest' or 'immoral', its

importance in love life has also changed.

Therefore, it is essential that in the absence of sex, we ask ourselves why we feel bad and

what that intimate encounter means to us.

Laziness as opposed to sexual initiative (and variety), giving priority to activities that do not require effort or the lack of time in the face of marathon work days can make

sex no longer seem desirable,

but it is a necessary element for the well-being of the couple.

If

the absence of sex

is turning your

love story into a tragedy,

my recommendation is clear: don't settle and go for

sex therapy.

The fullness with the other drinks from many sources and for some people, eroticism is an inalienable.

According to the criteria of The Trust Project

Know more

  • lifestyle

  • Sex

  • couple relations