The issue of withdrawing the emblem from the referee Sultan Marzouki confirms us randomness and primitiveness in the football system, and everything that happens confirms that we are in a system that runs contrary to the current, although everyone outside the football system agree that the management of the game is still below zero, compared to the rise of the UAE institutions In all areas and activities.
Support is unlimited from our wise leadership, whether moral or material, and unfortunately administrative blunders harm sport at the Asian and international levels, because the UAE, leadership and people, race the world to excellence, but unfortunately in sports and management of sports institutions and committees «approach random»!
The issue of Marzouki, not sympathy, raises questions to those who have taken a decision to withdraw the emblem, most notably: What have you done? Are the criteria on which they are based? Did you take into account if Marzouki went to legal bodies against those who robbed the emblem overnight?
I tried to communicate with the committee of referees, but they also apologized for talking until the regulation is adopted by the Continental Confederation, and may agree or disagree, but they have no right to decide to take away the rights of others unlawfully, and if the withdrawal of the emblem is adopted, Marzouki will only have to cry The spilled milk, because the emblem if you go will not return, according to a source within the corridors of the Union, what happened on the orders and sudden decisions, and if they understand what they would have been better to be warned and informed in advance, and to be written and formal, not even orally The decision-maker is not in suspicion, and there is no warning or notification The ruling Sultan Marzouki, but a hearing took place after an official request for Marzouki, and the rest of the stadium judges who have the badge to conduct medical examinations, to send the list of names, including, which confirms that the decision to withdraw the badge was overnight!
I reached out with former and experienced referees, as well as legal advisers, and they have the right to nominate and undoubtedly have the right to withdraw, but in accordance with the standards of transparency, integrity and honesty, and if there are doubts in the procedures there will be other chapters, and external interventions to lose the legality of the decision.
To read the previous articles of the writer please click on its name .
Are the criteria used in the Marzouki case legal?