Chung Kyung-Shim's trial at Dongyang University enters a new phase with a full-time trial.

The new court took part of the prosecution's claim and decided to launch a witness paper on allegations of entrance examination.

The Seoul Central District Court's Criminal Consensus Division 25-2 (Jeong-Yim Lim Kwon Sung-soo Kwon Sun-hee Kim, Deputy Judge) decided to call Choi Sung-hae, the former president of Dongyang University, as a witness after hearing the court's proceedings.

Previously, Professor Jung's trial has been conducted mainly on private equity suspicions among the two pillars of the case, which are divided into the suspicions of entrance exam corruption and private equity.

The prosecution's long-term accomplice investigations resulted in some of the lawyers' claims for defense of defense, as the prosecution first provided lawyers with a record of private equity allegations.

Professor Chung's trial department changed his entire member to court court personnel last month.

At the first hearing after the trial changes, the prosecutors insisted that a hearing on allegations of entrance examination should be conducted first.

As Professor Jung's arrest period is nearing expiration, it is necessary to call on the core witnesses of suspicion of entrance examination in order to hear the testimony.

On the other hand, Professor Chung's lawyers said, "The evidence of private equity funds is still being investigated, and now it is questionable whether re-entry the entrance exam partly from the beginning to meet efficiency or speed."

The Tribunal then suggested that the opinions of both sides were drawn parallel to each other.

According to the importance of the prosecution's opinion, if they apply for witnesses, they will proceed with the newspapers and summon the witnesses required by the lawyer.

In response to this policy, the Tribunal agreed to call the former president of Dongyang University as witness.

Choi has stated that he never issued a citation issued by Professor Chung and the daughter of the former attorney general.

Prior to the president, Dongyang University employees and the head of the Institute of Science and Technology (KIST) are also witnesses.

Professor Chung's assistant professor at Dongyang University decided to call on the illegality of the seizure search.

As a result, it is expected that a sharp workshop will be held this month regarding the authenticity of the citation, one of the hottest issues in Professor Chung's case.

Prosecutors and lawyers, who used to have wars every time they were brought to court by a previous trial hearing, had a tough nerve war on this day.

Professor Chung's lawyer said, "In the previous trials, prosecutors reacted excessively to act as if there were problems in the court." "

The prosecution refused to comply with the court's lawsuit after the previous court refused to change the complaint, and it strongly pinpointed the objection.

The prosecution countered that, "There was a defect in the proceedings at the time, so the objection was made in accordance with the legal regulations."

The court said, "Please refrain from pointing out that you have misrepresented each other in today's trial."

The court also said it would merge the two cases of counterfeit citations that the former court refused to change.

However, we have announced a policy to determine whether the facts are identical.