<Anchor>

There is a truth work around the request for the ban on the departure of former vice minister Kim. When the Supreme Prosecutor's Office rejected a request to ban the departure of the past history investigation team, the prosecutor immediately rejected it, but today a press conference was held to refute the prosecution's claim.

It is reporter Lim Chong-jong.

<Reporter>

On April 4, Kyung Hyang Newspaper reported that before the deputy minister of Kim Hak-soo attempted to leave Japan, the prosecutor's office refused to request the departure of the truth investigation team.

However, Daejung stated that the dispatch inspection team of the investigation team had to submit an opinion to prohibit departure from the internal communication network, but he wrote that he withdrew his opinion the next day.

Attorney Kim Yong-min, a member of the Justice Department's Committee on the Past Affairs, received a report from the investigation team and held a press conference to refute the claim.

Kim explained that he had consulted with the Great Sword about whether he would send a letter to the Ministry of Justice to leave the immigration bureau.

Since then, the investigation team has decided internally to send the document to the investigation team. Suddenly, the researcher sent a document containing "Considerations".

Kim's case was already unacknowledged, and there was no rhetorical point, Kim said, in effect, that the Great Sword was against the ban.

[Yongmin Kim / Attorney: 'How to send a request for an immigration order' is not a good idea because of the strong opposition of the Great Sword. Then let's think about what the third way is and what the other way is. "

This is the position that the Great Sword was sent without any knowledge of the investigation and sent the legal considerations.