Tribal sheikhs and notables in the Gaza Strip announced that they stand at the back of the resistance, supporting it and rejecting any coup against it (social networking sites)
As we approach the sixth month of the occupation’s aggression against Gaza, the resistance is still steadfast with legendary steadfastness despite the siege imposed on it for seventeen years, which means, as a result, that the resistance is not prepared for this long war, which is what the occupation was betting on, despite its strategic inability to endure long confrontations. According to sober analyses, because of the weakness this causes in the economic and social structure of the entity, which is inherently fragile, which is confirmed by the data, including the collapse of the shekel and a significant increase in inflation, the cessation of many projects, at the economic level, and the flight of nearly half a million of those who were brought in to steal land from the entity. The occupier, and this is at the societal level, in addition to the rebellious movements that are absorbed among the soldiers of the occupation forces, whether their refusal to fight on the front lines, or their objection to excluding religious youth from military service altogether, which means that this society is boiling, in addition to the political crisis that The Netanyahu government is going through it, whether by the opposition or by the families of those detained by the resistance in Gaza, and international pressure at the governmental and popular levels on the overall crisis and the occupation government and its army’s handling of it.
The victor in war is not the one who kills the most, captures the most, destroys the most buildings, or occupies the most territory. The victor is the one who achieves his political goals in the war, and to know who is the victor, we must know the goals of both parties in the war.
Professor of the Department of History at the Hebrew University, Yuval Noah Harari
The decision to fight was unwillingness, no doubt, as we looked at the facts that were taken into consideration to make the decision to war, but perhaps you hate something, and God places a lot of good in it, and perhaps the good that the Al-Aqsa Flood operation left behind is manifold at the level of reviving the cause that has begun to decline. Intentionally and with premeditation, and we can refer to the article (The Arab-Israeli Conflict) in this regard, the issue declined further after the signing of the Oslo Accords, then it diminished to the point where it reached serving a Palestinian party who saw in me a guardian of the issue, so the occupation served in security coordination that was laid out in the Oslo Accords and engineered. His American Dayton project, leading to the series of Judaization in Jerusalem and the annexation of the West Bank lands, in conjunction with the public statements of the leaders of the occupying entity categorically rejecting the establishment of a Palestinian state and denying the right of the Palestinian people to self-determination, in parallel with a state of unprecedented rushing to normalize relations with the occupying entity by Arab countries, In an unprecedented case of liquidating the issue and stealing what the Oslo Accords left for Palestinians and Muslims.
In recent days, previously faint voices have begun to rise, blaming the resistance for the Al-Aqsa flood operation, and considering that the occupation’s reaction was greater than the gains of the operation, which is a short view, if we evaluate the opinion from the standpoint of good faith, and if we follow those who launch the idea and promote it, We can safely say that his intentions go beyond concern for lives or development, even though the professor of the Department of History at the Hebrew University, Yuval Noah Harari, says in an article published in Yedioth Ahronoth newspaper, that “the war in the Gaza Strip is not about who kills.” More, but rather on the one who comes closest to achieving his political goals) and that (the victor in war is not the one who kills the most or captures the most, or destroys the most buildings, or occupies the most lands. The victor is the one who achieves his political goals in the war, and to know who the victor is, we must get to know the goals of Both sides in the war), which is what the resistance has achieved so far by bringing the issue back to the forefront, gaining the respect of the world, and forcing the occupation’s allies to qualitatively retreat from their positions. Therefore, those promoting the idea that the war brought nothing but destruction are either among the proponents of “stay for them on your straight path” or Those who have been contaminated by security coordination, and the two sects are involved in partnering with the occupier to eliminate resistance and empower him, claiming that the region will calm down, and that development will prevail, and the former may benefit in the near future, but they will be swallowed up later after the occupation gains control of the region, whether from its expansion project directly, or from the project Or they will be a prey for the two projects to fight over, or the second will be consumed before the occupation is able to take over the area. Perhaps the incident of the occupation soldiers’ attack on the Authority’s police station a month ago, leaving one of the Authority’s members wounded, is evidence that will be added to the settlement projects that are awaiting implementation on the lands of the West Bank, and then They will find no land to rule, nor aid to plunder.
The project of the day after the war in Gaza, proposed by Netanyahu, intersects with it in some ways with the American administration, which sees a greater role for the Palestinian Authority in Ramallah, especially in the security aspect in the Gaza Strip after “everyone” agreed to liquidate the resistance, and a few days ago, the head of the Authority’s intelligence proposed , Majed Faraj, the idea of establishing an alternative security force to the workforce in Gaza, and it seems that the ongoing assassinations of leaders of police branches and departments in the Strip by the occupation forces is a preparation for this project proposed by Faraj, even after the tribal sheikhs and notables in the Gaza Strip announced their support for the resistance. Supporting it and rejecting any coup against it. There is no doubt that the position of the notables and tribal sheikhs is based on a national motive, but it is also based on learning from the experience of the awakenings in both Iraq and Egypt, even if its impact on the former was more apparent, which temporarily thwarted the project, but with the acceleration of the assassinations. The entry of “oily” money may appeal to some weak souls.
The occupation and its supporters in the West and in two regions have become certain that the occupation has been defeated strategically, and that attempts to revive it to fulfill the role for which it was appointed in this region are at stake, and therefore the resistance must be eliminated and the situation must be stabilized after that.
The idea of creating an alternative security force to the force operating in Gaza opens a new front for the resistance. And a stab in the back at a difficult time, when the resistance and its popular backing need to show cohesion and cohesion so that the resistance can free itself from confronting the occupation and the major forces fighting with it. However, many obstacles will face this force to be established, even with the proposal to form the backbone of this force from the remaining members of The security forces of the Palestinian Authority in Gaza, to ensure their loyalty. However, there are major challenges facing this project, the first of which is that the occupation itself wants to take over the security operation itself so that it can disarm Gaza. Then, testing the loyalty of the elements relied upon is extremely difficult after... Every home in Gaza has tasted the bitterness of losing one of its relatives in that barbaric war of occupation, and therefore efforts to identify the nucleus of the security personnel in the project will be an impossible path, especially since the project also depends on the success of the Palestinian Authority in reforming itself and gaining credibility to rule at a stage. After the war in Gaza, after the performance of its security personnel in the West Bank and the reputation left behind by security coordination.
This proposal, which is sought by both America and the Authority, and which could be approved by the Netanyahu government, or whoever will come after it, after the end of the war, and if amendments were made to it, it could be read as two things. The first is that the occupation and its Western and regional supporters have become certain that the occupation has suffered a strategic defeat. And the attempts to float it to fulfill the role for which it was planted in this region are at stake, and therefore the resistance must be eliminated and the situation must be stabilized after that, so that the resistance does not rearrange its ranks, if it is defeated, or if the resistance infection infects the region after the possible reality, The second thing is that just as the occupation has a functional role, the authority has also become its functional role to make people laugh, which will, in my imagination, make its supporters and affiliates reconsider their calculations that were based on the struggle of the first generation. This generation erased these glories, after the resistance and its popular incubator removed the fig leaf. Which covered the private parts of the successors, and they even disgraced their predecessors.
The opinions expressed in this article are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the editorial position of Al Jazeera.