THE WORLD Madrid
Madrid
Updated Friday, March 15, 2024-11:59
The current affairs table every Thursday in
El Hormiguero
has a very clear structure:
Pablo Motos
puts the topics of the week on the table and his collaborators give their opinion, clarify and provide information about them.
When it is political or judicial news, it is
Cristina Pardo
who is in charge of explaining the news.
Then,
Juan del Val
and
Nuria Roca contribute their opinions and, then, there is Tamara Falcó, who usually remains silent - as
Pablo Motos
has reproached her more than once
-, lest she get into a puddle of which she is difficult to get out.
In fact, it is common that when
Tamara Falcó
intervenes on a topic that she knows she is not an expert, her assessment ends up becoming a string of headlines the next day.
It is also not unusual that it is
Cristina Pardo
who often puts the
Marquise of Griñón
in her place by correcting some of the things she says.
Last night, precisely, one of those moments occurred with the difference that this time
Cristina Pardo
was much less amused by
Tamara Falcó
's comment regarding the case of Ayuso's boyfriend, a case that, by the way, has been the news of the week.
After first talking about the approval of the Amnesty Law and the lack of Budgets for the legislature,
Pablo Motos
brought up the alleged tax fraud of the boyfriend of the president of the Community of Madrid, a matter that inflamed the collaborators more than for the topic itself due to
Tamara Falcó
's reaction .
Cristina Pardo
was
the first to explain what happened and to assess where Ayuso was with the entire investigation to her partner.
"I think that citizens can legitimately think that
Díaz Ayuso endorses this type of behavior," said the journalist, explaining that in
Ayuso
's press conference this Wednesday
, the president claimed that her boyfriend was the victim of a hunt to harm her. her, and a few hours later the letter from the lawyers of
Ayuso
's boyfriend to the Prosecutor's Office was published
in which he acknowledged possible tax crimes and requested an agreement.
Juan del Val
and
Nuria Roca
spoke in a similar way, warning that many citizens may consider that Ayuso lied, but it was
Tamara Falcó
who then took her feet off the pot.
The Marchioness of Griñón came out in defense of the president of the Community of Madrid with an argument that her colleagues did not like at all: "The accounts have not been approved, Puigdemont is back... a complete disaster and we are giving time to Ayuso's boyfriend ... They can't be compared! I just don't understand it!"
"Well, understand, Tamara!" Cristina Pardo then snapped at her in a tone that revealed a certain anger with Falcó.
"It's not that we are comparing, it's that they are the news of the day and the week.
As if we had talked little about the amnesty, Sánchez or the Koldo case in this program!
" the journalist pointed out.
Tamara Falcó
then intervened again, ensuring that "they are getting us to talk about this issue when it really only concerns
Ayuso
and
Ayuso
's boyfriend ."
Pardo
, who had really been bothered by Tamara Falcó's words, continued trying to make her partner see that this was not about a fixation on
Ayuso
: "We don't know what's underneath, it started concerning Ayuso's boyfriend, just yesterday She did not tell the truth, I insist, I do not know if because she did not have the information or because she did not want to tell it, and we do not know how it was paid..."
Tamara
didn't let Pardo finish and cut him off: "Exactly! We don't know yet."
It was at that moment when
Juan del Val
entered fully into the confrontation that his companions were having, also sending a clear message to the Marchioness of Griñón: "
Tamara
, what you say about 'they are achieving'... This is the problem of permanently joining one side. This may or may not be a smokescreen, but they don't give me false invoices. What cannot be done permanently is that I like Ayuso better than Sánchez, I'm not saying that this "Whether you do it, whatever Ayuso or someone related to her does wrong is because they messed with her. That's not worth it."