The investigation is to be led by a parliamentary committee with representatives from all parliamentary parties, something that Lawen Redar (S) is positive about.
However, she is critical of what she believes is missing from the directives.
- What is not clear is how to strengthen the independence of SVT, SR and UR, she says.
According to her, it is clear that the Sweden Democrats have had great influence over the directives
- It has contributed to the fact that parts that should be fundamental have been excluded and other parts have meant a political shift in how one perceives the mission of the public service companies, says Lawen Redar.
"Built-in political conflict"
Amanda Lind (MP) is also critical of the new directives.
- I think they are fuzzy, they are unclear.
It is clear that the ink has hardly had time to dry before the battle over the interpretation of the directives within the government documents has begun, she says.
She believes that the Tidö parties built the political conflict that already exists around public service into the directives and she lacks greater clarity.
- They are not clear about the broad mission and public service independence, and I am strongly critical of that, says Amanda Lind.
The government also wants the public service's mirroring mission to be reviewed in its entirety.
The assignment means that SVT and SR must show the population's variation and include an equality and diversity perspective in their programs.
- It is an obvious concession to the Sweden Democrats and I think that is very unfortunate.
The mirroring task is about everyone in Sweden feeling that public service is something for them, she says.