Celebration of the Nakba.. What are you Palestinians doing?

At the end of last November, the Palestinian cause witnessed an exceptional and remarkable event, which the Palestinians should not pass unnoticed.

As the United Nations General Assembly voted in favor of a resolution to assign the “Division of Palestinian Rights in the General Secretariat” to devote its activities to organizing a high-level event in the United Nations General Assembly Hall on May 15, on the occasion of the 75th anniversary of the Nakba of the Palestinian people, and voted in favor of 90 countries voted for the resolution, while 47 countries abstained from voting, and 30 countries opposed the resolution;

Among them are the United States, Canada, Australia and the United Kingdom.

The Zionist entity considered the Nakba resolution anti-Semitic, as did US President Joe Biden, who commented indirectly on the content of the resolution, criticizing the senators who hesitated to denounce anti-Semitic actions.

This event opens the door wide for the Palestinians to take urgent action in order to change the equations of the conflict with the Zionist entity, because of its implications and the opportunities it contains.

China supported the resolution, and believed that partial management of the crisis cannot replace a comprehensive solution, and that no one has the right to use the right of veto (veto) on issues affecting the future of the Palestinian people, and that, as a permanent member of the Council, it will work to practice true pluralism in it.

motivating connotations

Despite the delay in issuing the decision;

It was not an ordinary decision for the Palestinian people, who have been struggling on dozens of fronts for nearly 100 ungodly years, the likes of which no people have seen in the contemporary world, and it is better late than never.

This decision came to inject new fuel into the veins of the Palestinian cause at the international level, after it had greatly declined due to the turmoil in the Arab region, and the infiltrations made by the Zionist entity to the Arab regime.

Bypassing the decisions, principles and policies that governed the situation with him over the previous stages of the conflict;

The implications of this decision exceeded what was not in the calculations of the Zionist entity, and the most prominent of these indications are:

• The issuance of the decision coincided with the anniversary of the issuance of the partition decision on November 29, 1974 AD, after 74 years;

  It indicates that changes have taken place in the international situation, which have brought the Palestinian cause back to its early beginnings, and opened its old files, to reappear on the surface of international events with the support of the countries of the world, to shed light on the suffering of the Palestinian people, and to support them again to restore their rights and self-determination, despite what the world is going through. From transformations, conflicts, and sharp competitions between the great powers, despite the prevailing belief that these decisions are outdated.

• The position of the Zionist entity in the General Assembly session that adopted the resolution reveals the extent of the loss it suffered, and the annoyance it caused, to the extent that its ambassador to the United Nations, Gilad Erdan, accused the United Nations of helping to prolong the conflict with this decision, and he believed that this might result in The destruction of the Jewish state, calling on the United Nations to stop ignoring the (Jewish Nakba).

  Referring to the Jews who were expelled from the Arab and Islamic countries in the aftermath of the Zionist entity's state.

  This prompted the Zionist entity's embassy directly to organize an exhibition, the first ever on the expulsion of Jews from Arab countries and Iran, for a week in the main corridor of the United Nations in New York under the title "The Story of the Jewish Nakba".

• The positions of the 90 countries that supported the resolution reveal their strong rejection of what the Palestinian cause has come to, with little progress to date, their solidarity with the Palestinian people, their pain for their suffering, and the seriousness of their supportive positions.

  The positions of these countries also reveal that they are ready to take further steps, in order to reach serious solutions that lift the injustice against the Palestinians, put an end to their suffering, and achieve self-determination for them.

In this context, we refer to the speech of the representative of China, which is engaged in a multi-field competition with the United States and the European Union, as this competition was reflected in his speech, when he stressed that partial management of the crisis cannot replace a comprehensive solution, stressing that China is a loyal friend of the Palestinian people, and that The Security Council needs to take fundamental steps to advance the two-state solution, and that no one has the right to use the right of veto (veto) on issues that affect the future of the Palestinian people, and that his country, as a permanent member of the Council, will work to practice true pluralism in it.

In the same context, the representative of the State of South Africa, Matthew Joyni, described the continued expansion of illegal Israeli settlements, expulsions, demolitions and destruction of Palestinian property throughout the occupied Palestinian territory.

It is a "brazen and illegal tactic" on the part of (Israel) to change the demographic balance and the character and status of East Jerusalem in favor of the Jewish citizen.

She stressed that Israel's imposition of an apartheid regime against the Palestinians undermines any prospects for the establishment of an independent Palestinian state.

The United Kingdom opposed the resolution even though it was the maker of the catastrophe for the Palestinian people, and it is more aware of the details of what happened to the Palestinian people because of its approval and facilitation of the establishment of the Zionist entity in Palestine. And he will never forgive her

The resolution was supported by 15 Arab countries, namely: Egypt, Morocco, Tunisia, Algeria, Libya, Saudi Arabia, Qatar, Kuwait, Oman, the Emirates, Bahrain, Syria, Iraq, Lebanon and Jordan. Strongly with the resolution, and with the inalienable and historical rights of the Palestinian people stipulated in international resolutions, and all of them condemned the Zionist aggressions against the Palestinian people and the Palestinian land, and this indicates that the Arab position in general is biased towards Palestinian aspirations, despite the fragmentation and turmoil that the Arab region is going through.

The main countries that opposed the resolution alongside the Zionist entity are the United States, the United Kingdom, Canada and Australia. As for the United States, it is not surprising that it opposes the resolution, because it is an established principle of its constants, and it used to do so in all the decisions of the Palestinian cause in support of the rights of the Palestinian people.

Rather, she went far in her opposition when she considered that the United Nations is busy in its annual ritual of ratifying outdated and biased resolutions against (Israel), and that the United States is determined to oppose all resolutions that tarnish the reputation of (Israel).

This is in a direct message to the Zionist lobby in the United States to support President Biden and the Democratic Party in order to win the upcoming elections.

As for the surprising position, it is the position of the United Kingdom, as it is the creator of the Nakba for the Palestinian people, and it is more aware than anyone else of the details of what it did to the Palestinian people because of its approval and facilitation of the establishment of the Zionist entity in Palestine, and it was better for it to agree to the decision to atone for one of its massive sins against The Palestinian people will never forget it and will never forgive it.

What is more strange than that is the position of Canada and Australia. Despite our understanding of the pressures they are subjected to from the Zionist lobby within each of them, it would have been better for them to support the decision in line with the human values ​​that they rant about day and night.

This opposition reinforces the previous double-standard American and Western positions, and reveals once again the extent of deception and hypocrisy that envelops the slogans and values ​​of the rules-based international order to which they demand the world to submit.

The Palestinian leadership must always denounce, oppose and expose the positions of these countries, with or without occasion, by various means and in all fields.

The positions of all the countries that voted in favor of the resolution strengthened the view that the two-state solution has failed, and that serious action must be taken to implement this solution and establish a Palestinian state in accordance with international resolutions, which is an impossible matter that will not be achieved, and that the Palestinians' continuation of this solution is tantamount to running after the impossible, and that no There must be a serious search for alternative solutions that would restore Palestinian rights and force the countries that support the Zionist entity to respond to the demands of the Palestinian people.

There are 5 and a half months left to implement the decision, so what is your position, O Palestinians?

And when will you move?

And what are you doing?