The grotesque of Josema Yuste at the expense of the "homosexual union"

On December 22nd -look, days have passed and it's still going strong-,

started

, on

, with this phrase: "This is horizonte and we come here to learn. Since it's so delirious and so..., yes , so grotesque what happens in this blessed country that we love so much, well...

".

proposed

at the start of the program is what finally happened.

.

"A few weeks ago, the largest television archive in Europe,

, offered us a series of great jags," he continued.

Gags from

, by

and

, with which

cried with laughter and with which everyone, at the time, when they were broadcast, probably did too.

.

They are those gags of the "faggot from Spain", "my husband hits me" and many others.

.

Society evolves, although some do not want to see it.

No one says that those gags should be erased from our memory and from the historical humor of the duo.

They were gags from the Spain of the 80s, from the Spain of the 90s and not, of course, that

.

But you have to understand why they don't look at each other with those eyes.

But that does not mean that the grotesque that Iker Jiménez was talking about at the beginning of

is not "this blessed country", but rather that

goes as a representative of that humor and regrets that today that humor of that time cannot be done .

Thank God that you can't because it means that some, the majority, have indeed evolved.

"There are guilds -yes, just like that, guild- currently with which you cannot do humor, it is very complicated. Before you could do it and nothing happened. Like

,

... You did humor in a white and nothing happened", released the comedian to complain about the current limits of humor.

And, of course, he has gotten involved.

The program was broadcast last Thursday and we are on the 26th and it is still kicking.

Perhaps it is due to the scarcity of news or, perhaps, because now this is no longer valid.

In fact,

has gotten into a garden for trying not to see clearly what she really thinks and believes.

He wanted to ally himself with what the

, but at the same time he could not help but stick his neck out and show his little leg.

The little leg is the one that, even appealing to the fact that humor has to evolve with society, humor experiences a censorship that has not been experienced for years.

Yes, you're right.

There is a containment, a self-censorship to which social networks have led, but above all

.

I insist, the gags of

that today would be impossible have to continue in our memory, but we must also understand that today, what then seemed not to offend or humiliate,

, because today those who He already humiliated those he offended, in addition to being aware, they are no longer silent about feeling offended and humiliated.

"Now it seems that you have to put obstacles to humor

," said Carmen Porter, not knowing that the obstacles were going to go through "the guilds."

said at the time

.

"We were absolutely free and we only put on a red line.

."

So far I highly doubt anyone disagrees.

In fact, there is a phrase that says that freedom of expression ends when it interferes with the right to honor.

's phrase

accepted the rule of law.

But then that side that he tried to hide under phrases made of, as they say, looks good, made its appearance.

"(...) The red line has now gone down six steps. Now I don't dedicate myself to humor but I do comedy theater and I try to make my gags fun, witty, horny..., but

and before you could do it, and nothing happened, like with the black race, homosexuals...".

Josema Yuste

does not understand anything and will not understand anything because it is not a matter of now not being able to make humor about whites, blacks, homosexuals, fat, skinny, handsome or ugly.

Of course you can do humor, look at La que se avecina, what cannot be done is that this humor crosses the red lines that he himself had previously marked:

.

"I have seen gays call each other a faggot and nothing happens, but it should not occur to you."

the auction.

And where has Josema Yuste seen that happen?

It is to understand absolutely nothing at all.

Well yes, he did understand that his reference was going to provoke a wave of reactions and so he decided to blame the many red lines that there are now with humor, which are still the same as those that existed, but adapted to reflect the society that exists. now, that it was time to pull the easy, politicians and social networks:

. "

As if we couldn't think for ourselves, as if we couldn't realize that telling a "faggot" joke or making a joke about the mistreatment of a woman is now not liked or funny because now the values ​​of society have changed and because

.

And then when he has already entered the puddle, when he knows that what he did not want to be seen ended up coming out because it is very difficult to hide what one really thinks, then it is when the time comes to

: in the harassment and the damage that social networks do.

Anyway... it's so predictable.

"Before, what will they say was the neighbor, a cousin of yours, a brother-in-law... And it did not reach you because there were no social networks. People lived in a healthier, less contaminated way. We are very contaminated by the opinion of others and very mediated".

Well yes, social networks have a great danger that makes you find out everything and also that everyone can crush whoever they consider.

Yes, and it has happened to him.

.

Surely 30 years ago he would never have found out, although it seems that he still doesn't find out, why there is humor that today does offend and why there is humor that can now be said to 'offend'.

According to the criteria of The Trust Project

Know more

• Four