outside the text
who are you!
Dirar with Al-Hol Al-Falasi
belhouldherar@gmail.com
November 10, 2022
Through one of the sophist discussions and sterile dialogues with a quarter of our philosophers, one of them mentioned that the late Libyan President Muammar Gaddafi was the author of the word “Who are you!” I told them: Wrong.. It is mine, I am the first to use it in an article entitled: “Tom Con That is, “Who are you?”
In Urdu, one of them replied that I do not allow them to express their opinion, because I always reply and suppress their freedom of expression, and he describes me jokingly with the tongue, and intent in the heart: Shut up about us, “Abulsan Tall”!
Here I remembered what happened in a prestigious university and against a large group of students, and the majority were from the Faculty of Political Science, and some were talking about freedom of opinion at the behest of Professor Al-Ashqar, who instilled in their minds that they need more freedom of opinion and criticism!
So I started by asking several questions because the lecture was a dialogue, and it was the trap that I had set to reach the desired goal!
The first question was: Have you read the UAE constitution?
I repeat: Have you seen, not read?
The result was zero.
No one read or browsed the constitution, so the second question was: How many paragraphs in the constitution talk about freedom of opinion and expression?
Of course, the result was zero.
And here I answered sharply: You talk about freedom of opinion while you are ignorant of the size of the space granted to you?
Who are you to criticize your homelands!
And who are you to demand more freedoms and you did not make any effort to search for information or, as you say, “meeted”.
It is not necessary to be a student in political science or international relations or a writer or a political analyst to read the constitution of your country. Express your opinion on political topics and analyzes, and do not make yourself a "laugh or a mackerel."
Unfortunately, we have a group of society that gives itself the absolute powers to “criticize, attack and political clowning,” with its narrow and backward perspective, in which it expresses a sterile political background, and the phrase that their tongues are not without “in Western countries and high open societies” they do.. They say.. die...etc.
And at the end of sterile sophist arguments that have no meaning but excessive chatter, I discover that I am arguing with empty personalities!
A question comes to my mind if they like what the West is doing, “Why don’t they turn away from us to the West or Uncle Sam’s communities?”
Which of you are?
It shows its path.. Dear philosopher, writer and experienced politician, do not exceed your limits in criticism of our noble and kind society so as not to throw yourself into perdition!
I would like to remind you of the Emirati proverb: “Most of the hammering loosens the weld.” Do you understand what your problem is?
belhouldherar@gmail.com
@DonaldTrump
To read the previous articles of the writer please click on its name.
belhouldherar@gmail.com