Ukraine is creating a "dirty bomb" and is going to use it on its territory.
This was reported by RIA Novosti with reference to its sources.
A "dirty bomb" is such a nuclear bomb at the minimum.
It does not require super high technologies to create, however, with a much lower explosion power, it nevertheless creates a large area of nuclear contamination (hence the "dirty" one).
What, in fact, is the goal of the regime - to create a zone of infection and accuse Russia of inhuman methods of warfare.
In the use of nuclear weapons against a non-nuclear state.
According to RIA Novosti, Kyiv (with the help of some Western curators) has already begun the practical implementation of this plan.
The leadership of the Eastern Mining and Processing Plant, located in the city of Zhovti Vody, Dnepropetrovsk region, as well as the Kyiv Institute for Nuclear Research, was tasked with making this "dirty bomb", and work on it is already at the final stage.
Moscow takes these threats very seriously.
That is why Russian Defense Minister Sergei Shoigu made a whole series of calls to his Western counterparts.
Apparently, the minister let them know that: a) Russia knows about the impending provocation and b) the response to it will be very tough.
Moreover, the answer is not only to Ukraine, but also to those who will help the Kyiv regime to organize this provocation.
The West has officially stated that it does not believe in the possibility of such a provocation.
“Our countries have made it clear that we all reject Russia's blatantly false claims that Ukraine is preparing to use a dirty bomb on its own soil.
The world will recognize any attempt to use this allegation as a pretext for escalation,” the US, French, and British foreign ministries said in a joint statement.
Yes, and Kyiv denies everything.
“Russia's lies about Ukraine's alleged plans to use a dirty bomb are as absurd as they are dangerous.
First, Ukraine is a devoted supporter of the NPT: we do not have any "dirty bombs" and we do not plan to have them.
Secondly, Russians often blame others for what they themselves are planning,” said Ukrainian Foreign Minister Dmytro Kuleba.
And if the last sentence in his statement can be viewed as an indirect recognition of the impending provocation with the subsequent accusation of this against Russia (it makes no sense for Moscow to detonate a “dirty bomb” - in the most extreme case, it has quite effective tactical nuclear weapons in its arsenal), then by itself the idea of the Kyiv regime using a “dirty bomb” on its territory at first glance looks strange.
This is the death of people, this is nuclear contamination, and this, in the end, is a nuclear cloud that does not know where it will fly.
No normal state power will carry out such a provocation on its territory.
However, the problem is that this logic works in relation to state power.
To those who make decisions in the interests of their country and their people.
To politicians who think at least in medium-term categories (not to mention long-term ones).
None of the above applies to the current Kyiv regime.
It is not a state power, since the Kyiv leaders do not perceive Ukraine as a full-fledged state.
For them, it is, in the words of Vladimir Putin, an "anti-Russia" project.
Accordingly, the reason for the existence of this project is not to achieve the maximum level of security and prosperity for the Ukrainian population (in this case, Kyiv would have long ago fulfilled the conditions of the Minsk agreements), but to cause maximum damage to the Russian Federation.
Either on their own or by someone else.
That is why the Kyiv regime is happy to lend its country to the British, Poles and all those who want to turn Ukraine into an anti-Russian foothold.
Even at the cost of the security and well-being of Ukrainians.
That is why he was shelling the Zaporozhye nuclear power plant, without even thinking about the possible consequences in the form of a nuclear explosion.
Finally, representatives of the Kyiv regime do not think in medium-term terms.
In a situation where the security of the state is not guaranteed, when it "here and now" depends on external supplies, the leaders of Ukraine act on the principle "we would stand day and hold out at night."
In the end, each of them knows that if he stands this day and this night in the interests of foreign sponsors, then he may well count on the legalization of everything that he managed to steal from the Ukrainian budget and from foreign sponsorship (which the same Americans in within the framework of grandiose schemes for sawing it, they are ready to share a little with the “native leaders”).
And legalization is a house abroad and life for your own pleasure under the protection of local special services.
That is why the leadership of Ukraine should be considered not as politicians, but, in fact, as the leaders of a terrorist group, the logic of whose actions is precisely the use of a “dirty bomb”.
Actually, this is how State Duma Chairman Vyacheslav Volodin views it.
“The threat of a terrorist attack in the US and Europe with the use of such a bomb existed until 2011, until Osama bin Laden was destroyed.
The methods of nuclear terror do not change: what Osama bin Laden had, Zelensky remained the same ... The President of the United States and the heads of European states, providing financial and military assistance to the Zelensky regime, become sponsors and accomplices of nuclear terrorism, ”said the politician.
But if we say "a", then it would seem that we should also say "b".
If Volodymyr Zelensky is equated with Osama bin Laden, then (see "Strikes on Decision Points")
at the very least, he should be officially labeled a terrorist and deprived of any chance of any negotiations with Vladimir Putin (see "We don't talk to terrorists").
Nevertheless, the leader of the Kyiv regime feels very comfortable, and Russian officials at all levels continue to talk about their readiness for dialogue.
Yes, there are political aspects here.
Refusing to negotiate is not comme il faut, and calls for dialogue are made on such terms (see “The will of the citizens of the DPR, LPR, Kherson and Zaporozhye regions is not subject to discussion”) that the negotiations themselves become unlikely.
However, if we consider the Kyiv regime a terrorist one, then we should treat it as a terrorist one.
To discourage all terrorists.
The point of view of the author may not coincide with the position of the editors.