Jorge Javier Vázquez and Tamara Falcó: from love to hate in a week

• Stories Why we love Tamara Falcó: "It's a door to a fascinating universe"

• MomenTVs Tamara Falcó 1 - Jorge Javier Vázquez 0

When the whole

case jumped last week ,

was elevated to the Olympus of

-if she was not already-.

All of Spain pending the breakup of the

, her words, what was happening.

While most of us were aware of cheating and breakups, there were also many who remembered that

is not as good a girl as she is painted.

But it was not the time.

, in a wonderful communication strategy, diverted all the spotlights towards

and towards that live entry to offer her first words after her breakup with

to a program that has not always been sweet to her, without charging, and without asking for anything in return.

Tamara Falcó managed to leave

himself speechless

, who gave in to her and the 'great gift' she had just given them.

But, as the Spanish proverb points out, there is a step from love to hate.

In this case, from love to hate, only a week has passed.

LOC

Falcon snows.

Tamara Falcó: her breakup will earn her more money than her fairy tale

• Writing: BEATRIZ MIRANDA

Tamara Falcó: her breakup will earn her more money than her fairy tale

The

continues to be the absolute protagonist of the Spanish gossip column.

The throes of her breakup with

and her search, now, for the most anticipated interview, his, is still in the spotlight.

But in case it was necessary to add fuel to the fire,

went to

and messed it up, messed it up showing that face that many have been pointing out this week, but the shadow of the breakup was too long.

Tamara Falcó

took advantage of the momentum of the week to travel to Mexico for

.

She shouldn't be surprised.

's ideas

are not a secret nor has she ever hidden them.

A Catholic meeting, with talks and symposia of priests and conservatives.

Very

.

Let no one forget that the night he told everything, everything and everything in

, the Virgin was always present.

God is always present for

, the classic, Catholic, apostolic and Romanesque family model is always in

.

This is not a surprise, but it is when

loosens her tongue and the damage is already irreparable.

During her presentation at the

,

spoke about the traditional family, but she also had time to charge against

, of course, and against "different types of sexualities".

As if it was the fault of

's horns that not all of us were heterosexual in the world.

"Now we are living a very complicated moment for humanity because there are so many different types of sexualities,

", and the thing exploded into the air.

Speeches like these are the ones that must be discarded, words like those of

yesterday in

, although hot, although on fire, are the ones that should be heard.

A wave of criticism, indignation, astonishment.

said it as she says everything, it seems that she says nothing, but she is saying everything.

And the love and understanding that

had shown her a week ago crossed the line to the other side.

"

is playing a very, very dangerous game. I reaffirm that if it is as I have read it,

is becoming a very harmful element for this society,"

started Monday in

.

"Because of people who think like you, who demonize a sexuality that is not the one you have, fortunately people generally live their sexuality in a free way. I will not allow people like you and associations like the ones you support to return again to send us to darkness and depression," he continued in that state that

acquires when his indignation goes much further.

No, what happened yesterday afternoon was not part of the show, what happened yesterday afternoon was a cry to point out those speeches that, although to a lesser extent, are still present in our society.

"I am 52 years old, I have suffered a lot for being gay, I have lived my first sexual experiences in the dark because there were people like you who did not accept this (...) We have to fight because people are free, because they can express themselves as they want , but as long as there are people like you who demonize liberty and freedom of choice, effectively

."

For

's words

in Mexico "propagated and incited hatred."

"And that you stop the damage as you are doing. You attack the dignity of many people and we cannot allow speeches like yours to have a place on television (...)

, reconsider because apart from being a lie , you are a very harmful and harmful element for this society," he concluded.

And yes, they shouldn't be allowed on TV, and that should go for everyone.

Because the words of

, pointing out the different sexualities as the axis of evil, may seem like an attempt to justify an infidelity that has nothing to do with the types of sexuality but with the values ​​of the one who was her partner.

But

, in her sauce, in a conservative and Catholic

, did not measure.

Just like last week, she perfectly controlled when, how and what, in Mexico

showed that side, which at this point should no longer exist.

"We should not be so understanding with her because

. What she has done is a clear hate speech and they must be denounced and fully rejected. Because first there are the speeches and then the hosts come in the street. You have to cut them off at the root. There are opinions that are not respectable, "said

before passing other issues from the

rundown .

The words of

in a matter of seconds were praised and applauded by thousands of tweeters.

What

had achieved a week ago, the understanding of a good part of society, became "this cannot be allowed" led by

.

And there will be those who say that the words of the

were not so bad either , but this is like the whiting that bites its tail.

The interest generated by everything that

can say right now , each one I know her words, makes what she says acquire a relevance that, perhaps, at another time, goes unnoticed and here peace and then glory.

But not now, now pointing to the different types of sexuality, linking them with evil sounds like a speech about a pulpit destroyed long ago with the effort and sacrifice of many.

If you are an image for some things, if you have to take care of her so much,

should have put a stop to her thoughts.

She who thinks them, well let her think them, but expressing them puts many advances at risk and helps keep the next evolution in dry dock.

Why?

Because

is the public figure of the moment, because what she says can be heard here, on the other side of the pond and wherever she is, because if you are so famous you have an obligation that is sometimes forgotten and that often causes irreparable damage.

Conforms to The Trust Project criteria

Know more

• Tamara Falco

• Jorge Javier Vazquez

• Telecinco

• Save me