Speaking about the current grain harvest and the problems of domestic agriculture in general, V.V.
Putin mentioned a somersault with Black Sea grain exports.
He noted that as of September 23, out of 203 ships with grain that left the ports of Ukraine, only four (that is, 2%) went to the countries in need, noted in the UN program.
“Grain from the ports of Ukraine continues to go past the poorest countries.
We talked about it, we talk - all in vain, no one just hears.
The situation here does not change - a complete swindle, and nothing more.
I repeat, the West is provoking a global food crisis,” the president stressed.
In fact, the politicians of the West, not to mention Ukraine, have not been particularly truthful before.
And in the conditions of the current conflict, not to say “war”, they are all the more lying as they breathe, since this is customary in war.
Of course, with the Istanbul agreements of July 22, it turned out indecent.
The deal, which is signed by Russia, Turkey, Ukraine and the UN, involved the export of Ukrainian grain, food and fertilizer across the Black Sea from three ports, including Odessa.
As a result, the great humanitarian breakthrough (“War is war, but bread is for the hungry, it is sacred”) was completed by 2%.
Once again confirming that our Ukrainian brothers and their Western brothers cannot be trusted in anything.
“To transport the priest in a sieve” is their national sport.
But let's look at the problem from their point of view.
Lamentations about starving Africa were typical talk in favor of the poor.
In reality, it was a military stratagem.
The Istanbul agreements partially unblocked the port of Odessa, the main sea gate of Ukraine.
Opportunities have opened up for both legal exports (bread, fertilizers) and illegal export-import operations.
For example, for black weapons export.
Somehow it is necessary to sell abroad the supernatural amount of Javelins and Stingers delivered to Ukraine.
And all this, according to Tyutchev, "without moving a gun, not a ruble."
One only northern cunning.
Of course, reproaches about the poorest Negroes who got a donut hole can only be met with good-natured laughter.
You still reproach us for double standards.
By the way, the missing Washington teacher of scientific communism N.V.
Zlobin, who never got out of our TV before, praised American politics in exactly this way.
Noting the complete frivolity of moral claims against her.
“The main thing is success” (especially in war), but isn’t the bloodless unblocking of the sea route from Odessa a model of success?
Everything is so, and it would not make sense to criticize the northern cunning of the enemy, if only two sides participated in the game - Russia and the West (albeit through the Ukrainian gasket).
However, sometimes you need to be able to count to three.
In addition to Russia and the countries of the golden billion, who are ready to go to any trick and even filth in an effort to defend their golden status - underwater cotton in the region of Bornholm Island is a guarantee for this - there are also countries of non-gold billions: Africa, Asia, Latin America, to which the united West does not match and not a brother.
As S.V.
Lavrov: “The unipolar model of world development, which served the interests of the golden billion, whose overconsumption was provided for centuries at the expense of the resources of Asia, Africa and Latin America, is becoming a thing of the past.
Today, the formation of sovereign states, ready to defend national interests, leads to the formation of an equal, socially oriented and sustainable multipolar architecture.”
It's not that Russia was unusually dear to these sovereign states - in international politics, every man for himself, one God for all.
But now they and Russia do not have a sharp clash of interests and there are areas for cooperation.
Whereas all that the free world can offer them now is to go to die for their homeland.
American.
And the frank cynicism shown in the case of the grain convoys from Odessa, ostensibly to feed the poorest countries, but in reality - to replenish the bins of the West, can hardly contribute to the popularity of Western politics.
Here, the gap between touching words and cunning deeds is somehow completely indecent.
And when you really want to eat, irritation from such indecency only gets worse.
There is nothing special to negotiate with the countries of the golden billion, that is, with America and its satellites.
We know we agreed.
Whereas even passive support from the countries of non-gold billions can play a role.
The point of view of the author may not coincide with the position of the editors.