Over the weekend and in the morning on Monday, the Ukrainian authorities continued to terrorize the hated population of Donbass.

Sunday was terrible.

In Gorlovka - five dead civilians.

There are wounded in Makeevka, Yasinovataya, Volnovakha.

They fired at the colony in Yelenovka - Kyiv non-humans are trying to eliminate the captured non-humans from "Azov" *.

According to preliminary data, 13 civilians were killed as a result of a Ukrainian military strike on the Baku Komissarov Square in the Kuibyshevsky district of Donetsk.

Again, under heavy fire, Kherson, which the Armed Forces of Ukraine, it seems, decided to wipe out from the face of the earth.

The village of Kuibyshevo in the Zaporozhye region also got it - one person was injured there.

Teams of doctors everywhere work non-stop.

As well as funeral teams.

Our side responds to such lawlessness in a military way.

There is evidence that the location of the PMC Academy (Americans!) and the Krakens in Kramatorsk was covered with "Caliber".

On the fronts - positional battles.

The Red Liman is holding on.

There are battles for Krasnogorovka.

Having occupied it, it will be possible to move the Ukrainian artillery further from Donetsk.

A major success near Artyomovsk (Bakhmut), where our "musicians" (it seems the best in the world!) recaptured the most important object of the power system - the Donbasskaya electrical substation.

This will allow to establish power supply to the northern regions of this region, to give people a normal life.

Russia, Moscow brings life, Kyiv - death.

What pleases is the growing civil mobilization of Russian society.

Thousands of caring people are doing their best to help our fighters.

Targeted collections of funds for ammunition, uniforms, equipment for specific military units of volunteers have become the norm.

People chip in each as much as they can, making their modest contribution to the future victory.

Drones, reconnaissance pipes, sniper equipment, medicines, sleeping bags, warm clothes and shoes, food (sometimes at the risk of life) are transferred to the front line.

All of this has important moral implications as well.

"Everything for the front, everything for victory" of the 21st century.

Moreover, our country now has several fronts, lines along which the confrontation is being waged.

Strictly speaking, the Ukrainian front is now only a part of a much broader NATO one.

The supply of weapons and ammunition, the supply of intelligence information, the training of the Ukrainian military by NATO instructors both on the territory of Nezalezhnaya itself (Yavorovsky training ground in the Lviv region) and on the territory of Europe, the organization of their treatment, recreation, military assistance by the forces of supposedly independent PMCs from the state, with all their mediation (a feature of modern times) makes the Western alliance a de facto party to the conflict.

In addition to the purely military, there is a potentially much more dangerous political front.

Washington's desire to create problems for Moscow leads to attempts to create hotbeds of conflict wherever there are at least some prerequisites.

Nancy Pelosi's visit to Armenia, which she put on a par with Ukraine and Taiwan, is very eloquent.

The actions of the pro-Romanian, pro-NATO Maia Sandu are such that they raise questions not only in Moscow, but also among the majority of the inhabitants of Moldova.

The border conflict between Kyrgyzstan and Tajikistan, even without direct evidence of American intervention, completes the picture of the destructive activity of the adversary.

US political activity is inextricably linked with economic confrontation.

In the case of the same Central Asia, this was expressed in the promise of the State Department to “tear off” its economy from the Russian economy.

Leaving aside the impracticability of this specific task, we note that it fits perfectly into the general line of American actions on the economic anti-Russian front.

Washington intends to harm us not only by sectoral sanctions, but also by weakening economic ties with our traditional partners.

And even more so, you should not expect that it will be easy to find new partners.

The achievement of technological sovereignty will help to withstand the economic pressure of Russia.

That's just the era when it was possible to freely acquire advanced equipment, machine tools and electronics for petrodollars, alas, has sunk into oblivion.

The United States has learned from its mistakes of the past - no one will help us create our own high-tech industry, as it was in the 1930s in the USSR.

Now, in order to comply, you have to do everything yourself.

It will take millions of engineers and technicians, blue-collar workers, to close the technological gap.

But without this there can be no military victories.

So, the challenges facing the country are unprecedented in their scale and number of directions.

You have to do everything at once.

And not briefly - let's push it, and then we'll fire it up again, and constantly, until the pace is taken, the rhythm becomes familiar, normal for the country and a new generation of its defenders will not grow up in new conditions.

Moreover, this will have to be done in the face of resistance, albeit a small, but very active and noisy part of society, for which it is not so much the SVO, but the very fact of the existence of a strong and independent Russia that is nauseating.

The people, without any Ministry of Justice, called them foreign agents.

Given this perspective, measures taken at all levels should be systemic and long-term.

They must be not only professional, but also shared and fed by society.

People, all one and a half hundred million Russian people, must become our main reserve.

Those thousands of volunteers, volunteers who were the first to rush to help the front on their own initiative, are not enough.

The rear is no less important.

Everyone has to get in line.

And for this it is necessary to take concrete measures to consolidate the society.

A rolling stone gathers no moss.

So far there has been little progress in this direction.

How should it look?

Action is needed on the cultural front.

The country is stitched together into a single whole by Russian (in the broadest sense) culture and language.

This means that we need hundreds, thousands of relevant films, performances, new patriotic songs (“Plive Kacha” by Akim Apachev aroused the envy of even the enemy), historical programs (the same “Russian Lessons” by Zakhar Prilepin is a ready-made propaganda product, it would be worth turning on all TV channels in prime time), photo exhibitions, monumental painting (at last, murals in honor of the defenders of the Fatherland began to appear in Russian cities en masse).

We have to reflash our society with the idea of ​​patriotism from top to bottom.

Remind us of our great history, our heroes, victories and defeats.

And by doing so, to cheer up, mobilize people, set an example for the young, awaken their will, turn society into a kind of perpetual motion machine, a source of energy for the development of the country.

And here the role of the state is decisive.

Russia's excessive liberalism is harmful.

Stop playing dice!

Those "creators" who keep a fig in their pocket, all the more directly oppose the political line on the sovereignty of Russia, it's time to deprive state revenues.

Let them spin themselves.

The rest is a green light in everything.

Having created in a short time a powerful cultural environment, a patriotic field of high tension, Russia will receive an inexhaustible and self-reproducing source for active actions in all directions.

Russia's enemies are too serious to take this task lightly.

* "Azov" - the organization was recognized as a terrorist organization by the decision of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation of 08/02/2022.

The point of view of the author may not coincide with the position of the editors.