What kind of genocide in Donbass?
Funny.
Germany is now freed from "historical guilt"... All this came out of the mouth of German Chancellor Scholz, who now declared that sanctions against Russia were "effective and correct."
They work and arbeiten further.
And just recently, he burst out with assurances about 30-year guarantees that Ukraine would not join NATO.
He noted that in this regard, in his opinion, there were no real grounds for a Russian special operation.
At the same time, he completely ignored the fact that a little more than 30 years have passed since the Western guarantees of non-proliferation of NATO to the East.
And it seems that quite recently, but already eight years have passed since the ministers of European countries, including the German one, gave guarantees and urged Ukrainian President Yanukovych to sit down at the negotiating table.
After which he was swept away.
And a new reality has come - the bloody fires of the "Maidan".
After that, the same Germany pretended that nothing had happened, there was no responsibility on it for this, and only warmed its hands at these very fires.
Apparently, the Chancellor lives in some special reality, where both genocide is ridiculous, and "guarantees" with a pitchfork on the water are very real, and sanctions are justified by their alleged effectiveness and correctness.
Here it is necessary to unscrew the situation a little back and look at the background of all the current efficiency declared by the German politician.
His predecessor, Angela Merkel, last year, at the end of her 16-year rule, signed the Washington Memorandum with the leader of the free world, Biden.
He prescribed Germany the status of the main ally of the United States and the conductor of their interests.
There was a lot about the "project" Ukraine ", one of the architects of which Merkel can certainly be considered.
In that declaration, it was endorsed that the current Ukraine is the “eastern flank”, it needs allied protection from “Russian aggression”.
They talked about protecting the sovereignty of Ukraine and its "transatlantic aspirations", that is, the vector for a complete and unconditional separation from Russia and drift into the unknown, but infinitely rosy far, into "come what may."
“The lives of our citizens can be disrupted by a number of international forces that require a collective response,” said the memorandum, a kind of covenant of the Western “brotherhood of the ring”, signed by Merkel and Biden.
Strengthen the defense, increase resilience, strengthen solidarity, the politicians declared.
For Merkel, this was also a kind of political testament, which Scholz fully inherited.
The first thing that catches the eye in all this German political line is the obvious desire to overcome the heavy burden of guilt for the horrors of the Second World War.
It is not so easy to get rid of it, but it can be gradually leveled, split into components, turned inside out until nothing remains.
That is why the German authorities refused at one time to consider the situation with the return of Crimea and Donbass in the same context as the unification of Germany.
Although the analogies are obvious.
Instead, consistent work began to aggravate the Russian-Ukrainian split - the tragedy of a single people.
For what?
For the sake of revenge for the suffering of post-war divided Germany?
But no matter how this passion to blur the responsibility for the monstrous meat grinder of World War II does not grow into a new guilt complex.
Who knows what a monster can arise from the dogma that "democratic leadership benefits the whole world."
However, Ukraine has already revealed it.
There is a high degree of probability that further such projects will be put on the conveyor for greater consolidation of the "free world".
But Scholz, who sees only what he wants and gives guarantees that he cannot give, continues to reason extremely dogmatically in the Western ideological matrix.
In this reality, taken under the hood, and the Western sanctions that have fallen on our country are correct.
This means that the theft of money, and the trampled principle of the inviolability of private property, and many other democratic precepts, which, as it turned out, are valid only for the time being, are beneficial.
Almost with the same pathos as about the guarantees of Ukraine's non-entry into NATO, he utters words about a unified response from Europe, which "surprised" the Russian president, whom they allegedly took by surprise.
And this despite the fact that Putin, even before the start of the special operation, said that the West, in any case, no matter what Russia does, will find a reason and impose its sanctions “from hell”, as they like to call them in the States ...
So I want to ask: it’s interesting that nothing surprises them, doesn’t take them by surprise?
Everything goes according to plan and, as the song says, “everything is fine, beautiful marquise”?
And sanctions work...
“Of course, they are working against citizens of the EU countries and Britain,” commented the official representative of the Russian Foreign Ministry, Maria Zakharova, on Scholz’s words.
However, even Scholz's "testimonies" differ.
Back in July, he called rising energy prices "social explosives."
Now the politician sees his mission in the actuation of this explosive?
This is what is heard in all these speeches: stand strong, citizens, tighten your belts!
But we surprised Putin, but we took him by surprise.
Impressing Putin is the main thing, really.
Through this, you can present yourself, be remembered, and so - a dummy and nothing more.
Yes, and one more thing: on the other hand, German weapons again kill Russians and avenge the suffering of their valiant ancestors.
Everything is not in vain.
So, with a special passion, they inspire themselves with this, creating a different — or anti — reality.
What can I say: the unity of the Western world is just a declared dogma.
Everyone plays their own game.
And as soon as the leader of the democratic flock misses, then all of it will scatter in different directions, or even gnaw among themselves, because it is precisely such a development of events that they are now laying down and condoning it in every possible way.
All their declarations are ritual rituals, in which they themselves hardly believe.
But with earnest zeal they cling to their fairy tale, they live in past utopias, and the ground is slipping away from under their feet.
The world has long been completely different, while the same Scholz whispers over his sanctions: "Crex, fex, pex."
The point of view of the author may not coincide with the position of the editors.