The "Scenarios" program (9/2022) continued calls for rationalization and sitting at the dialogue table in order to agree on a new formula or an appropriate settlement that would spare the blood of Iraqis and establish a new stage in the country's political scene.
In this regard, Essam Al-Faili, professor of political science at Al-Mustansiriya University, explained that the Iraqi environment is dominated by cautious anticipation among all political parties. is not possible.
He considered that the Iraqi situation is facing a crisis of an integrated political system and not a crisis of people in the country, pointing out that the end result was the harm of the Iraqi citizen in light of adhering to the administration of the state through what he described as the political feudal system.
On the other hand, writer and political analyst Jassem al-Moussawi considered that the Sadrist movement will not rely heavily on the decision of the Constitutional Court, and that the coordinating framework will not consider itself victorious because he knows that the parliament session cannot be held without the approval of al-Sadr, whose partners may stand without holding it.
winner and loser
He also made it clear that the coordinating framework does not take a stubborn position against the Sadrist movement, expressing its objection to the logic of the winner and loser of the Constitutional Court's decision. And a limited loss as the logic of the equation of political stability in Iraq.
For his part, the head of the Center for Political Thinking, Ihsan Al-Shammari, said that in light of the coordination framework's adherence to the position of forming a quota government and holding a parliamentary session away from the average limit of the Sadrist movement's demands, this makes the dialogue difficult to verify, stressing that the dialogue table can move the country towards stability.
He added that accepting the coordination framework with the decision to dissolve Parliament will lead to an appropriate dialogue table, noting that resorting to dialogue before dissolving Parliament will not lead to a result or settlement paths between the parties.
It is noteworthy that the recent bloody confrontations were not the result of their moment. Rather, they were the result of accumulation, some of which were due to the problems that accompanied the last parliamentary elections on October 10, and the ensuing disagreements regarding the formation of the government, and some of them to the quota system that has existed for nearly two decades since Time, which was expressed by the Iraqi president when he described the crisis as not being immediate, but rather an acute crisis linked to the system of governance and its impotence.