For some it will have been an eternity, for others a sigh: three years after the end of

Game of Thrones

, its first spin-off series is released.

The house of the dragon

also arrives ready to star in its own television confrontation, because only 10 days after its premiere on HBO Max, the first series derived from

The Lord of the Rings

will arrive on Prime Video .

Will the Targaryens and the elves mix in our heads?

Will we recognize which series each dragon belongs to?

A few very entertaining weeks await us.

The house of the dragon

is not only faithful heir to

Game of Thrones

in what counts, but also in who and how it is done.

Set a couple of centuries before the events of

Game of Thrones

(you know: multiple families, one throne, what could go wrong), the series centers on

the Targaryens,

a noble lineage whose advantage in life is having and knowing. use dragons.

Although, as King Viserys Targaryen (Paddy Considine) makes clear in the first episode of the series, who owns who, who controls who.

This warning (it is: we have seen more series before) is given by

Viserys

to his daughter

Rhaenyra.

(Milly Alcock), who at times seems to have information about the future (or access to HBO in 2016) and what her descendant

Daenerys will experience.

You know: from a sold girl to a vengeful girl, from there to a military chief and then...

Oh that ending.

Game of Thrones

closed with a tremendous betrayal of its cruel, cynical and novel essences.

The war was not won by the one who most deserved it, but by the one who least stained it with blood.

Neither the smartest nor the most resistant nor the most violent sat on the throne.

Suddenly the sword and sorcery series that wanted to be more than just a sword and sorcery series decided to play nice.

Rhaenyra seems to be thinking of all this as she sees what is happening around her: the need for a male heir (and we continue to patriarchal bingo) leads her father to almost lose his temper, her uncle

Daemon

(Matt Smith) declares himself in rebellion and out there people are still dying in battles of all kinds.

Because this is the world created by

George RR Martin:

violent, bloodthirsty, unjust and, ultimately, medieval.

This last adjective has been providing a lot of work for British interpreters in this type of fiction for years.

There is no such thing as a white American Middle Ages, so the way to make any medieval portrayal more believable is usually to populate it with Old World actors and actresses.

Thus we paved the way for another of the favorite qualifiers for series like

House of the Dragon

: "Shakespearian".

A word that doesn't really mean anything but that we can define as people dressed in period costumes speaking with great solemnity.

And if they are families, ahem, thunderous, much better.

Besides, who would want to see well-matched noble clans?

The relatives of

The house of the dragon

are in the fight, of course.

The series with this is not kidding.

There his medieval portrait is as crude as it is brave from an initial episode masterfully directed by Miguel Sapochnik.

Neither he nor Ryan J. Condal,

showrunner

, skimp on bloody scenes.

Truculence and gore occupy an interesting place in

House of the Dragon

, stretching those limits that

Game of Thrones

clearly set itself.

But now you knew what you were coming for, so

the combination of aristocratic opulence and military carnage is neither frightening nor surprising.

And the first "dracarys", a word that we could define as "that happens to you for messing with someone with dragons", is received as a gift for those who had been waiting for it for three years.

Dragons, so anticipated (so well anticipated) in

Game of Thrones

, appear in

House of the Dragon

from the get-go.

In these magnificent bicharracos the two concepts of the series are perfectly combined.

They are highly sophisticated creatures and at the same time primitive beasts, wonders and mysteries, realities and legends.

They are the bridge between drama and fantasy.

And they are, all told, gorgeous.

And it is that if something is noticeable in

The House of the Dragon,

it is that those responsible have learned a lot from the eight seasons of the mother series.

We do not see in the new production the scarcity of means of the first installments of

Game of thrones

.

Now attacks with all weapons from the beginning.

Nor is the series by Ryan J. Condal and JRR Martin sinful of that unnecessary visual rococo in which

Game of Thrones

fell in some of its sections, more concerned with exhibiting the bulging budget that it already had then because it was a really adult series.

There are visual compositions in

The House of the Dragon

that know how to be epic and stylized at the same time, because one is perfectly compatible with the other.

The series is well served by the muted, almost rotten tones and the confused sounds of some of its most violent scenes.

It is not falling short, it is betting on the long term.

It also works, like

Game of Thrones

at the time , a cast without superstars that the viewer will soon associate only with this story.

Because the real star of

The House of the Dragon

is

The House of the Dragon

.

With permission of the dragons, of course.

Conforms to The Trust Project criteria

Know more