• Criticized for the use of the word "spazz", which can refer pejoratively to a disabled person, in her song

    Heated

    , Beyoncé agreed to re-record her song.

  • Lizzo had used the same word in her song

    Grrrls

    and had also chosen to return to the studio to turn off the criticism.

  • For Steevy, of the YouTube channel Musicfeelings, the artists acted in this way precisely because they are already engaged on issues of inclusivity.

Like Lizzo a few months ago, Beyoncé had to re-record one of her songs because it contained a word deemed offensive by people with disabilities.

For Lizzo it was the song

Grrrls

, which is on the album

Special

and for Beyoncé it was the song

Heated

, from

Renaissance

.

In both cases, it was the same word that caused the problem: 'spaz', a slang term derived from the pejorative word 'spastic', which in the UK can refer to someone with cerebral palsy.

In a statement, a spokeswoman for Beyoncé announced that the singer would re-record the problematic word, assuring in an email that "the word was not intentionally used to hurt".

Lizzo said she "did not want to promote hurtful language" and said she was "proud to have listened and acted".

Monica Lewinsky asks to remove her name from the song

Score

Steevy, who hosts Musicfeelings, a YouTube channel devoted to R&B and hip-hop, doesn't necessarily agree with the decision to re-record: “It's disproportionate.

I can understand that people are offended by the use of a word but on social networks you always lose the context.

Beyoncé used the word in an American context, where the word means "out of control".

I understand that in the English context this is seen as a kind of insult to people with disabilities.

But the context in which Beyoncé wrote it is different.

»

Since this controversy, Monica Lewinsky asked Beyoncé on Twitter to remove the lyrics from the song

Partition

, in which she is named ("He popped all my buttons and he ripped my blouse/He Monica Lewinsky'd all on my gown" ).

“I have two problems with that, answers Steevy from

Musicfeelings

.

The first is that music is art whether we like it or not.

You can criticize art.

But asking people to re-record every time scares me.

My second problem is where do we stop?

Monica Lewinsky asks to re-record a song from 2013. But maybe we could re-record a song from 2003, too?

We must recognize that we are in a society where art is not perfect, that it can hurt, that we learn from our mistakes and that's how we evolve.

»

Committed women particularly targeted?

If it often happens that the public or associations protest against the lyrics of a song, it is rare that artists return to the studio to solve the problem.

Do we demand more from Beyoncé or Lizzo because they are women committed to the rights and recognition of minorities, whatever they may be?

Musicfeelings' Steevy sees things from a different perspective.

“I think we are in an era where we ask that of everyone.

They, they give in because they already talk a lot to this public attentive to these questions.

Others will be attacked, but since they are less engaged with this public, they will not withdraw their words.

I would be surprised if a rapper implicated for this kind of thing re-records the songs.

»

According to the

Guardian

, the British association Sense, which had criticized Beyoncé for using the word "spazz", also admitted that the singer was "long-time committed to inclusiveness" and had not used this word. word "in order to cause harm", but that "words have power and can reinforce the negative behaviors that marginalized groups face".

Sense thanked Beyoncé for changing her lyrics and encouraged everyone to listen to the album now.

People

After Kelis' rant, Beyoncé removes "Milkshake" sample

People

"Renaissance": Beyoncé will re-record a song from her latest album, criticized by people with disabilities

  • Music

  • Beyonce

  • Culture