The influential Polish politician Radoslav Sikorski offered the West to give Ukraine nuclear warheads.

Knowing perfectly well how this threatens the West, well, and how much Poland can earn from this.

Warsaw put forward another suicidal initiative for Europe on the Russian-Ukrainian issue.

In addition to earlier statements made by the authorities about the need to abandon Russian gas, Seim deputy Radoslav Sikorsky proposed giving the Kyiv regime a nuclear grenade.

“Ukraine gave up its nuclear potential in 1994 after the signing of the Budapest Memorandum.

Everyone understood that an independent Ukraine would exist within the borders established during the Soviet Union… Since Russia violated the Budapest Memorandum, I believe that the West could give Ukraine nuclear warheads.

So that she can defend her independence,” he said.

And this despite the fact that Pan Sikorsky is not a simple deputy.

Prior to the Sejm, he was Minister of Foreign Affairs and Minister of Defense of Poland.

So, he had to understand at least two things.

Firstly, what will Ukraine do with nuclear weapons, and secondly, how will Russia react to the prospect of obtaining a nuclear weapon by the “drug addicts and Nazis” regime, which has already taken a number of efforts to ensure that the drug addicts do not end up with a nuclear grenade.

“In the foreseeable future, with foreign technical assistance, the pro-Nazi regime in Kyiv could get its hands on weapons of mass destruction, and the target for it, of course, would be Russia,” Vladimir Putin said, talking about the reasons for the start of the Russian special operation.

“We could not allow the frenzied, uncontrollable nationalists to have nuclear weapons,” said Security Council Secretary Nikolai Patrushev.

So, as Senator Andrey Klimov rightly noted, “even an attempt to do something like this can bring such trouble, primarily to the countries of continental Europe, that no one, including Poland, will find it small.”

“Poland itself, adjacent to the theater of operations, will suffer from the use by Ukraine of nuclear warheads donated to it by the West: radiation, as you know, does not recognize borders.

Did Sikorsky think about this?

Or the main thing is to harm Russia, and there the grass will not grow?

- He speaks

Did Sikorsky think about this?

Or the main thing is to harm Russia, and there the grass will not grow?

- He speaks

Did Sikorsky think about this?

Or the main thing is to harm Russia, and there the grass will not grow?

- He speaks

Senator Alexei Pushkov.

Not surprisingly, Russian officials raised the question of Mr. Sikorsky's qualifications.

“Polish politicians, controlled by the American transmission belt, are displaying extremist ideology, spreading hatred, inciting conflicts, and now they are threatening the planet with a violation of the nuclear non-proliferation regime,” said Russian Foreign Ministry spokeswoman Maria Zakharova.

“With such deputies, the Europeans will have much more serious problems than those they have already encountered today (refugees, record inflation, energy crisis),” wrote State Duma Chairman Vyacheslav Volodin.

However, Dmitry Rogozin was the toughest of all.

“I have a big request to the Polish and British authorities of Radosław Sikorski: remove this idiot as far as possible.

His chatter will not lead to good,

However, Sikorsky is far from being an idiot and not even a marginal.

Volodin is right when he talks about the problems that Europe will get, only not “with such deputies”, but with such a country.

Pan Sikorsky's proposal fully fits into the logic of Warsaw's behavior in the Ukrainian conflict.

In fact, Poland acts as the main external destabilizer and destroyer of the prospects for de-escalation.

From the very beginning of the conflict, Warsaw did everything possible to exacerbate Russian-European relations as much as possible, and now it is trying with all possible forces to add kerosene to the fire.

To do this, it not only blocks various attempts by the EU countries to establish a dialogue with Moscow (recall that foreign policy decisions in the European Union are made by consensus), but also regularly puts forward various radical initiatives, thereby transferring them from the category of unacceptable to the category of discussion.

Kyiv has already seized on this proposal and is beginning to swindle out nuclear warheads, putting Europe in an extremely uncomfortable position (you can’t give it, you can’t refuse it rudely either).

Warsaw is playing for aggravation not only because of Russophobia - the Polish elites see in the current crisis an opportunity to sharply strengthen their positions.

Both in Eastern Europe and in the EU as a whole.

First of all, Poland confirms its claim to be the leader of the anti-Russian camp in the European Union.

A leader whose services the British and Americans can use to aggravate Russian-European relations to the maximum.

That is why it is beneficial for the Poles to prolong the crisis in Ukraine as much as possible - the more acute the situation, the more the Poles will be needed by the West.

And of course, the "hyena of Europe", as Churchill called Poland, will not miss the opportunity to loot.

The fact is that large-scale military-political support for Ukraine (nuclear weapons, of course, will not be given to Kyiv, but many other systems - MANPADS, drones, MLRS, howitzers - will be supplied) can create a big problem for Europe.

The successful offensive of Russian troops in the eastern regions of Ukraine against the background of the depletion of Ukrainian resources and the growth of internal political problems for Zelensky can lead, if not to a collapse, then at least to a serious decentralization of the Ukrainian regime.

As a result, the western - bordering the EU - territories of Ukraine will be controlled by local gangs and paramilitaries stuffed with Western weapons.

And here Poland can easily offer itself to the European Union as a state,

able to control the unstable space to the east of the block.

True, for this Warsaw will require a) additional resources and money, b) permission to occupy part of the Ukrainian territory, c) the status of one of the EU leaders, d) non-intervention of Brussels in internal Polish affairs, and e) other bonuses that the Polish leadership deems necessary .

Therefore, Sikorsky is not a fool.

He is a criminal, a marauder, a provocateur.

But not a fool.

The point of view of the author may not coincide with the position of the editors.