China News Agency, Tianjin, May 20 (Yang Ziyang) A few days ago, the Tianjin Free Trade Zone Court held a public hearing in the case of plaintiff Zhang Changning v. On the 90th, he made a public apology at the top position of a self-media account to eliminate the impact, and at the same time compensated 1 yuan for mental damage as punishment and other reasonable expenses.

  It is understood that the plaintiff Zhang Changning is a Chinese women's volleyball player, who was selected for the Chinese women's volleyball national team and won many honors such as Olympic champion and World Cup champion, and has a high social reputation.

Defendant Liu released slanderous and insulting information against the plaintiff during the live broadcast of his We-media account, causing a large number of netizens to repost screenshots for evaluation, and criticize and derogate the plaintiff.

The release of the above information has seriously disrupted the plaintiff's normal work and life, and the defendant's actions have seriously violated the plaintiff's reputation.

  After trial, the court held that the defendant Liu Mou, based on the false information obtained on the online platform, then published a series of false remarks against Zhang Changning on the live broadcast platform, which were openly disseminated on the Internet. The necessary limit of the plaintiff has the nature of strongly insulting and degrading the character of the plaintiff.

And through the spread of the network, it has caused serious adverse effects on the plaintiff's social evaluation and reputation.

  According to Article 1024 of the "Civil Code of the People's Republic of China", "Civil subjects have the right to reputation. No organization or individual may infringe upon the right of reputation of others by insulting, slandering or other means. Reputation is a measure of the moral, moral, and ethical quality of civil subjects. Social evaluation of prestige, talent, credit, etc."

  As a natural person, the plaintiff Zhang Changning certainly enjoys the right not to be infringed by others on the social evaluation arising from his activities.

Therefore, the defendant's behavior constituted an infringement of the plaintiff's reputation, and the court made the above judgment.

  The defendant stated in court that he had recognized his wrongdoing, was willing to sincerely apologize, and took the initiative to fulfill the judgment.

(Finish)