• MomenTVs Eurovision has hurt and it has really hurt

  • TV Ukraine wins Eurovision and Chanel makes history by reaching third place with its chanelazo

The

European Broadcasting Union

(UER) -(EBU, for its acronym in English)- has confirmed the final classification of the 40 participants in the

Eurovision Song Contest

, after its investigation into the irregularities detected in the voting of six countries.

Thus,

Chanel

remains in third place,

the United Kingdom

in second and the victory remains for

Ukraine

.

The organizer of the contest has explained that this year's contest was "a great success in bringing together hundreds of millions of people around the world in unity and celebration", but as reported on Saturday May 14, the independent pan-European voting partner of the

European Broadcasting Union

(EBU) detected irregular voting patterns in the jury votes from six countries participating in the second semi-final:

Azerbaijan

,

Georgia

,

Montenegro

,

Poland

,

Romania

,

San Marino

.

Result of the investigation of the UER.UER

"The

integrity of the vote

, both by the national juries of each country and by the viewers who vote by phone or SMS, is essential for the success of the program", he stated, while adding that it is the duty of the EBU guarantee a valid result.

"Consequently, any breach of the rules is taken very seriously," she said.

In this sense, the entity has reported that, in the second semifinal, it was observed that four of the six juries

placed five of the other countries in their Top Five

, taking into account that they could not vote for themselves.

According to the

EBU

, a jury voted for the same five countries in their Top 6;

and the last of the six jurors placed four of the others in their Top 4 and the fifth in their Top 7. Four of the six received at least a joint 12 points, which is the maximum that can be awarded.

The pattern in question, as he has clarified, was detected as irregular by

Pan-European Voting Partner

and recognized by

Independent Voting Monitor

, since five of these six countries were classified outside the Top 8 by the juries of the other 15 countries that voted in the same semi-final, which included three of the

Big Five

:

Germany, Spain and the United Kingdom

.

Additionally, four of the six countries qualified in the bottom 6 of the other 15 countries that voted in this

Eurovision

semi-final .

"An irregularity in the jury's voting pattern of such

unprecedented magnitude,

" the EBU has declared.

According to the votes of the second semi-final,

Azerbaijan placed Poland

,

Georgia, Romania, Montenegro and San Marino

in its TOP 5 ;

while

Georgia placed Azerbaijan, Montenegro, Romania, San Marino and Poland in the top five rankings

.

In the case of the Montenegrin

professional jury

their six best positions went to

Georgia, Serbia, Azerbaijan, Romania, San Marino and Poland

.

For its part,

Poland

gave the top five places to

San Marino, Azerbaijan, Romania and Montenegro

, and placed Georgia in seventh place in the ranking.

San Marino, Poland, Montenegro, Azerbaijan and Georgia were the top five for the

Romanian

professional jury

;

while

San Marino

awarded first place to

Romania, followed by Georgia, Poland, Montenegro and Azerbaijan

.

You have the right to remove votes

In this way, the organizing entity of the contest has informed that, as established

by the Eurovision Rules

and the official voting instructions, if the votes of the national juries present irregular voting patterns (as detected by

Pan-European Voting Partner

and recognized by the

Independent Voting Monitor

), the executive supervisor of the

Eurovision Song Contest

"has the right to remove" the votes and "replace them with an automatically calculated substitute aggregate result to determine the final result of these countries in the second semi-final".

After consultation with

Pan-European Voting Partner

and

Independent Voting Monitor

, the EBU did so "to preserve the integrity of the voting system" and "given the unprecedented nature" of the irregularity detected in the second semifinal.

"These decisions were approved by the President of the Reference Group of the

Eurovision Song Contest

, the board of directors of the contest and the deputy director general of the EBU in accordance with the requirements of the Voting Instructions of the Contest", he confirmed, later adding which has since discussed jury patterns with the relevant broadcasters and given them the opportunity to further investigate jury voting in their countries.

The EBU reconfirms its decision to replace the jury votes from these six countries with a substitute aggregate result in both the second semi-final and the grand final, as well as the final ranking of the 40 entrants in the

Eurovision Song Contest 2022

.

"The EBU, its members and the Reference Group will continue to work closely together to safeguard the integrity and success of an event that has been a unique platform for creative talent for 66 years and looks forward to continuing to entertain audiences around the world." concluded.

Conforms to The Trust Project criteria

Know more

  • Eurovision

Keywords: