[Social Commentary] "20,000 yuan for a piece of waste paper"?

Don't let "copycat certificates" disrupt the formal market

　　To rectify the chaos of vocational certification depends on the continuous efforts of relevant parties. Certain institutions cannot be allowed to bypass the national vocational qualification catalogue and create another set, which will undermine the authority of vocational skill level identification, disrupt the standards for measuring vocational skilled talents, and impact the current situation. Some occupations and employment environment.

　　Can spend 20,000 yuan to test "weapon engineer"?

According to Xinhua News Agency, The Paper and other media reports, recently, the Ministry of Human Resources and Social Security Vocational Skills Appraisal Center issued a statement based on the issue of the so-called registered occupational qualification certificate issued by a company in Jiangsu reported by the public, saying that the company issued a statement with the "JYPC National Vocational Qualification Examination Certification Center". "Registered Vocational Qualification Certificate" is issued in the name of "Registered Vocational Qualification Certificate", which is not a vocational qualification certificate recognized by the state, and this institution is not a vocational skill level accreditation institution registered by the human resources and social security department.

At the same time, the Ministry of Human Resources and Social Security and the Central Internet Information Office recently issued a notice to carry out the "copycat certificate" network governance work for the training, evaluation and certification activities carried out for the society.

　　"Weapons Engineer", "Missile Maintenance Engineer", "Aerospace Engineer", some of these various "professional certificates" that can be obtained after only a few days of classes are made up by the training institutions themselves.

Among the "copycat certificates", some institutions and certificates are typical fakes. These institutions use the name, official seal and unit logo of a formal institution, and use websites with very similar domain names. One; some compliance agencies have non-compliant behaviors, and their out-of-scope training and other certificate-issuing behaviors with private goods are also not recognized; They even use their own made-up occupations to train and issue certificates to confuse public perception.

Taking the "carbon emission manager" in the catalog as an example, some institutions have changed it to "carbon emission manager" to carry out training and certification, and thus avoid rigid requirements such as filing.

　　The dazzling "copycat certificates" aggravate the confusion of the research group and impact the formal vocational certificate training market.

　　The chaos in the field of vocational research is related to the fact that there are many "Li Gui" subjects in training and certification.

In the "Opinions on Reforming and Improving the Evaluation System for Skilled Talents" by the Ministry of Human Resources and Social Security, it is required to "establish and improve the evaluation system for skilled talents with vocational qualification evaluation, occupational skill level identification and special occupational ability assessment as the main content". The right to determine the grade has been delegated, which has become the hardest hit by some institutions and the breeding of "copycat certificates".

In particular, some institutions deliberately misinterpreted the state regulations in advertising, falsely used the name of a formal institution, and illegally used words and patterns such as "China", "nationwide" and the national emblem, which increased the confusion of the "copycat certificate".

　　Secondly, it is related to people's cognitive lag and psychological anxiety.

Many people are unaware of the adjustment of the national vocational qualification catalogue and the changes in the recognition of vocational skill levels. The superimposition of the mentality of "doing too many certificates and not pressing for oneself" and following the crowd to apply for examinations when employment is difficult, to some extent, provides opportunities for "copycat certificates". .

　　Vocational certificates are the recognition of the skills of practitioners in related industries. The original intention of the state to let social institutions carry out technical skills training and certification is to provide more channels for workers to improve their vocational skills.

In a sense, the order and fairness of training and certification are related to the health and stability of the entire occupational employment ecology.

To rectify the chaos of vocational certification depends on the continuous efforts of relevant parties. Certain institutions cannot be allowed to bypass the national vocational qualification catalogue and create another set, which will undermine the authority of vocational skill level identification, disrupt the standards for measuring vocational skilled talents, and impact the current situation. Some occupations and employment environment.

　　To manage the "copycat certificate", relevant departments should also give more professional guidance to improve the talent evaluation mechanism, fill in the gap after the decentralization of authority and before the formation of a stable and diverse talent evaluation mechanism, and avoid the phenomenon of "Li Kui exits and Li Gui runs rampant".

　　To avoid being deceived by vocational examinations, the public should keep their eyes open, keep abreast of changes in the national vocational qualification catalog and vocational skill level recognition, establish the awareness of inquiring about the authority of vocational training records and certificates from the official website of the department, and be wary of the process of "passing" "Quick", "national recognition", "national prefix" and other propaganda words.

　　In order to let people make the best use of their talents, it is necessary to increase the training of skilled talents and enrich the evaluation system of skilled talents.

In this process, cleaning up the "copycat certificate" and maintaining the health of the vocational skill level recognition market requires the joint efforts of the whole society.

　　Newspaper commentator Wu Di