By the way, if you think that fakes about the atrocities of Russian soldiers are a remake, then in vain: the manuals of the West have not changed for many years.

The shadow of the coming cold war lay between Russia, England and the United States at the end of World War II.

The future demiurges of NATO were already zealous about the fact that it was the USSR that made the main contribution to the victory over Nazism, and tried in every possible way to belittle this achievement.

The dirtiest means of information warfare and black PR were used.

The myths about "thousands of raped German women" began to appear at that time.

Although in reality it was American and British soldiers who practiced violence against the civilian population of Germany.

Not so long ago, the FSB declassified an amusing telegram, which on December 19, 1945, the head of SMERSH, Abakumov, sent to the People's Commissar for Foreign Affairs of the USSR Molotov.

The document says that the American military mission was filming a staged film about the brutality of supposedly Soviet soldiers in a Hungarian village.

After filming was completed, the tape was sent to the US leadership.

The contractor for this fake was the famous American film studio Metro (Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer).

According to the plot, actors in the form of Red Army soldiers burned houses and raped a Hungarian girl.

I won’t be surprised if this film resurfaces even today, in the rampant world of Russophobia.

Moreover, the French have recently worked on similar patterns in Mali.

There, the French military was accused of war crimes.

The bodies of the victims were buried in the sand near the military base in Gossy.

The French, in response, published a fake recording from a drone, where some Africans and white military men bury people in the sand, saying that this was the work of the Malian army and its military advisers from the Wagner PMC.

How many fakes about Russia can we expect?

The question is rhetorical.

The fantasies of Russophobes and the possibilities of Hollywood are almost limitless.

But the truth is on our side!

The point of view of the author may not coincide with the position of the editors.